O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ:ORLY) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 88%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ:ORLY) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 88%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies O'Reilly Automotive's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構佔有量顯著高意味着奧萊利汽車公司的股票價格受到它們的交易行爲的影響
- 公司前25位股東持有50%的業務。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
If you want to know who really controls O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ:ORLY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 88% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着奧萊利汽車(NASDAQ:ORLY),那麼你必須看看其股東註冊情況。我們可以看到,機構在該公司中擁有絕大部分股權,佔比88%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about O'Reilly Automotive.
讓我們仔細看一下,看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於奧萊利汽車的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About O'Reilly Automotive?
機構所有權告訴我們關於奧萊利汽車公司的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that O'Reilly Automotive does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of O'Reilly Automotive, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到奧萊利汽車確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。 這可能表明公司在投資界有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好對依賴所謂的機構投資者的驗證持謹慎態度。他們有時也會出錯。 如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一家股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查奧萊利汽車的過去收益軌跡(以下)。當然,也要牢記還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in O'Reilly Automotive. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.9%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 4.2% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會很可能需要注意他們的偏好。我們注意到對於O'Reilly Automotive來說,對沖基金沒有相對有意義的投資。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,擁有8.9%的股權。相較之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.2%和4.2%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 25 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東名冊來看,前25大股東控制了50%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有大多數的股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of O'Reilly Automotive
奧萊利汽車公司的內部股東
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$555m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根據我們最新的數據顯示,奧萊利公司的內部人士所持有的股份不到1%。由於這是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士持有很小的比例。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值55500萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是買入還是賣出可能更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over O'Reilly Automotive. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有11%的公司股權權益的一般公衆,主要是由個人投資者組成,對奧萊利公司具有一定的影響力。雖然這個所有權比例可能不足以影響他們對公司決策的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand O'Reilly Automotive better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for O'Reilly Automotive you should be aware of, and 1 of them makes us a bit uncomfortable.
思考不同群體持有公司的股票總是值得的。但要更好地了解奧萊利汽車,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了奧萊利汽車的3個警告信號,您應該注意其中的1個,其中有1個讓我們有點不舒服。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。