These Return Metrics Don't Make SIA Engineering (SGX:S59) Look Too Strong
These Return Metrics Don't Make SIA Engineering (SGX:S59) Look Too Strong
If you're looking at a mature business that's past the growth phase, what are some of the underlying trends that pop up? Typically, we'll see the trend of both return on capital employed (ROCE) declining and this usually coincides with a decreasing amount of capital employed. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. In light of that, from a first glance at SIA Engineering (SGX:S59), we've spotted some signs that it could be struggling, so let's investigate.
如果你正在觀察一個成熟的業務,並且已經過了增長階段,那麼會出現哪些潛在的趨勢呢?通常情況下,我們會看到資本運營回報率(ROCE)的趨勢下降,這通常與被運營的資本量的減少相一致。這表明公司沒有再複利股東財富,因爲回報率下降,淨資產基數在縮小。鑑於此,我們初步觀察了新航工程(SGX:S59),我們發現了一些可能存在困難的跡象,所以讓我們進行調查。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
上面您可以看到蒙托克可再生能源現行ROCE與之前資本回報的比較,但過去只能知道這麼多。如果您感興趣,可以查看我們免費的蒙托克可再生能源分析師報告,了解分析師的預測。
If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for SIA Engineering:
如果您以前沒有使用過ROCE,它衡量的是公司在業務中使用的資本產生的「回報」(稅前利潤)。分析師使用這個公式來計算新航工程的ROCE:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.0013 = S$2.4m ÷ (S$2.1b - S$302m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.0013 = 240萬新幣 ÷(21億新幣 - 3.02億新幣)(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
So, SIA Engineering has an ROCE of 0.1%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Infrastructure industry average of 6.5%.
所以,新航工程的ROCE爲0.1%。最終,這是一個較低的回報率,低於製造行業平均水平的6.5%。
In the above chart we have measured SIA Engineering's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for SIA Engineering .
在上面的圖表中,我們測量了新航工程的先前ROCE與其之前的表現,但未來可能更重要。如果您有興趣,可以在我們的免費分析師報告中查看分析師對新航工程的預測。
What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us
儘管如此,當我們看 enphase energy (納斯達克股票代碼:ENPH) 的時候,它似乎並沒有完全符合這些要求。
We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at SIA Engineering. To be more specific, the ROCE was 4.1% five years ago, but since then it has dropped noticeably. And on the capital employed front, the business is utilizing roughly the same amount of capital as it was back then. Companies that exhibit these attributes tend to not be shrinking, but they can be mature and facing pressure on their margins from competition. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect SIA Engineering to turn into a multi-bagger.
我們對新航工程的資本回報率趨勢有些擔憂。更具體地說,五年前的ROCE爲4.1%,但此後明顯下降。而在已投入資本方面,該企業使用的資本數量與當時基本持平。具備這些特徵的公司往往不會縮小,但它們可能處於成熟階段,並面臨來自競爭的利潤率壓力。如果這些趨勢持續下去,我們不認爲新航工程會成爲一個多倍增長的股票。
Our Take On SIA Engineering's ROCE
關於新航工程的ROCE,我們的看法
In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Despite the concerning underlying trends, the stock has actually gained 3.6% over the last five years, so it might be that the investors are expecting the trends to reverse. Either way, we aren't huge fans of the current trends and so with that we think you might find better investments elsewhere.
最終,資本回報率下降趨勢並不通常意味着我們在看一隻成長股。儘管存在令人擔憂的潛在趨勢,但該股票在過去五年中實際上上漲了3.6%,因此投資者可能期望這些趨勢逆轉。無論如何,我們對當前的趨勢並不是很看好,因此我們認爲您可能會在其他地方找到更好的投資機會。
One more thing to note, we've identified 1 warning sign with SIA Engineering and understanding it should be part of your investment process.
還有一件事需要注意,我們已經發現了新航工程的一個警示信號,理解這一信號應該是您的投資過程的一部分。
While SIA Engineering may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
雖然新航工程目前可能沒有獲得最高的回報率,但我們已經編制了一份超過25%股權回報率的公司名單。在這裏查看這份免費名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。