share_log

With 87% Institutional Ownership, The Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 87% Institutional Ownership, The Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

憑藉87%的機構持股比例,紐交所上市的美國保險公司Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR) 成爲衆多機構投資者的首選。
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 23:25

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Progressive's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 24 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 由於機構持有股票的大量份額,Progressive的股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 一共有24位投資者持有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of The Progressive Corporation (NYSE:PGR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

通過查看The Progressive Corporation (紐交所:PGR)的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體最有權力。 機構持有87%的股份,是公司中持股最多的。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Progressive.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Progressive的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:PGR Ownership Breakdown September 16th 2024
紐交所:PGR所有權分佈2024年9月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Progressive?

機構持股信息告訴我們有關Progressive的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Progressive already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Progressive's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Progressive已經在股份登記簿上擁有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好還是要警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Progressive下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:PGR Earnings and Revenue Growth September 16th 2024
紐交所:PGR收益和營業收入增長2024年9月16日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Progressive. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 4.2% of the stock.

投資者應該注意,實際上有超過一半的股份由機構持有,因此他們可以集體行使重要權力。我們注意到對於Progressive來說,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,持有8.9%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約8.3%和4.2%的股票。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東註冊表可以看出,24位最高股東控制了50%的擁有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有擁有權的絕大部分。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Progressive

Progressive的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of The Progressive Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$439m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人員擁有Progressive Corporation不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,所以如果內部人員擁有公司的大部分股份,那將是令人驚訝的。雖然他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值43900萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Progressive. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Progressive 13%的股份。儘管這種持股規模可能不足以影響決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Progressive you should know about.

我覺得了解一個公司的具體所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了一項關於Progressive的警告信號,你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論