share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Walmart (NYSE:WMT) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Walmart (NYSE:WMT) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這4個指標表明沃爾瑪(紐交所:WMT)合理運用債務
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 22:26

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Walmart Inc. (NYSE:WMT) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險遠非同義詞。」當你考慮一個公司的風險時,自然會考慮它的資產負債表,因爲債務往往是企業崩潰時的重要原因。沃爾瑪公司(紐交所:WMT)和許多其他公司一樣,使用債務。但這種債務是否讓股東擔憂呢?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務在業務遇到支付困難之前,可以通過新資本或自由現金流來協助業務。 最終,如果公司無法履行還債的法律義務,股東可能一無所有。 然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,公司必須以低價籌集新的股本,從而永久性地稀釋股東。 然而,通過減少股權稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業的極好工具。 當我們審視債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平,一起考慮。

What Is Walmart's Debt?

沃爾瑪的債務是什麼?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Walmart had US$41.9b of debt in July 2024, down from US$46.3b, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$8.81b, its net debt is less, at about US$33.1b.

你可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示沃爾瑪在2024年7月有419億美元的債務,比一年之前的463億美元減少。然而,由於沃爾瑪有88.1億美元的現金儲備,它的淨債務較少,約爲331億美元。

big
NYSE:WMT Debt to Equity History September 16th 2024
紐交所:WMT資產負債歷史數據2024年9月16日

How Healthy Is Walmart's Balance Sheet?

沃爾瑪的資產負債表有多健康?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Walmart had liabilities of US$95.3b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$68.4b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$8.81b and US$8.65b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$146.2b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

深入研究最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到沃爾瑪有953億美元的一年內到期的負債,以及684億美元的一年後到期的負債。 另一方面,它有88.1億美元的現金和86.5億美元的一年內到期應收賬款。 因此,其總負債爲1462億美元,超過了其現金和短期應收款的總和。

Walmart has a very large market capitalization of US$647.9b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

沃爾瑪的市值高達6479億美元,因此如果有需要,它很可能可以籌集現金來改善其資產負債表。 但很明顯,我們確實應該密切審查它是否能夠在不發行新股的情況下管理債務。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

爲了衡量公司相對於其收益的債務情況,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨負債與 EBITDA),又考慮到了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。

Walmart's net debt is only 0.81 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 12.6 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. The good news is that Walmart has increased its EBIT by 9.4% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Walmart's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

沃爾瑪的淨負債僅爲其息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤的0.81倍。 而其息稅折舊及攤銷利潤覆蓋其利息支出高達12.6倍。 因此,我們對其極度保守的債務使用非常放心。 令人振奮的消息是,沃爾瑪過去12個月中的息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤增加了9.4%,這應該能夠消除對償還債務的任何擔憂。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。 但最終決定沃爾瑪能否保持健康的資產負債表前景的,更多的是未來收益。 因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Walmart's free cash flow amounted to 45% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,一家公司只能用實實在在的現金償還債務,而不能用會計利潤。 因此,值得檢查其息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤有多少由自由現金流支持。 在過去的三年中,沃爾瑪的自由現金流佔其息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤的45%,低於我們的預期。 當涉及償還債務時,這並不好。

Our View

我們的觀點

The good news is that Walmart's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! All these things considered, it appears that Walmart can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Walmart you should know about.

好消息是,沃爾瑪通過其EBIT覆蓋利息支出的能力讓我們喜歡它就像小孩子喜歡絨毛小狗一樣。而好消息不止於此,它的資產負債比也支持這個觀點!考慮到所有這些因素,沃爾瑪似乎可以輕鬆應對其目前的債務水平。積極的一面是,這種槓桿可以提升股東的回報,但潛在的下降風險是更多的損失風險,因此值得監控資產負債表。資產負債表顯然是在分析債務時需要關注的領域。但歸根結底,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。這些風險可能很難發現。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了一種針對沃爾瑪的警告信號,您應該了解。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論