share_log

Following a 2.6% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) Institutional Owners

Following a 2.6% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) Institutional Owners

在去年下降了2.6%之後,最近的收益可能會讓Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (紐交所代碼:APD)的機構投資者感到滿意
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 20:25

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Air Products and Chemicals' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構佔有量顯著高的意味着空氣化工的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前16名股東持有該業務50%的股份。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

Every investor in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (NYSE:APD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

空氣化工公司(NYSE:APD)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東群體。機構持有89%的股份,是公司中持有股份最多的群體。換句話說,這個群體對他們投資公司有可能獲得(或損失)最多。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 3.8% increase in the share price after a year of 2.6% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

在經歷了2.6%的虧損一年後,機構投資者可能會對上週股價上漲3.8%表示歡迎,這可能是回報率開始上升的跡象。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Air Products and Chemicals.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Air Products and Chemicals的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:APD Ownership Breakdown September 16th 2024
NYSE:APD 所有權分佈 2024年9月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Air Products and Chemicals?

機構投資者對Air Products and Chemicals有什麼看法呢?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Air Products and Chemicals already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Air Products and Chemicals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Air Products and Chemicals已擁有機構投資者的股權登記冊。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份,這表明在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個方面可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Air Products和Chemicals的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總會更加複雜。

big
NYSE:APD Earnings and Revenue Growth September 16th 2024
紐交所:APD盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月16日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Air Products and Chemicals. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.5% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.5% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 6.7% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對空氣化工公司,對沖基金持有的股份不多。目前,先鋒集團是最大的股東,持有公司已發行股份的9.5%。黑石集團是第二大股東,擁有普通股的7.5%,而Capital Research and Management Company持有公司股份的約6.7%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

通過股東登記簿我們可以看到,16個最大的股東控制着50%的所有權,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Air Products and Chemicals

空氣化工公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$229m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

根據我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士僅擁有Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.少於1%的股份。由於該公司規模如此之大,我們不會預計內部人士擁有大量股票。總體而言,他們共擁有22900萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,更有意思的是看看這些內部人士是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Air Products and Chemicals. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆(通常是個人投資者)持有Air Products and Chemicals 11%的股份。雖然這個群體可能不能決定事情,但肯定能對公司的運行產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Air Products and Chemicals .

儘管了解擁有公司的不同群體是很值得考慮的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的Air Products and Chemicals存在的2個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論