Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:MGIC) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$51m Last Week
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:MGIC) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged US$51m Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by public companies in Magic Software Enterprises indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 2 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Institutional ownership in Magic Software Enterprises is 19%
- 公共公司對Magic Software Enterprises的持股比例較大,表明它們共同在管理和業務策略上具有更大的發言權
- 前兩大股東擁有該公司的54%。
- Magic Software Enterprises的機構持股比例爲19%
If you want to know who really controls Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (NASDAQ:MGIC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that public companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.(納斯達克:MGIC),那麼您就需要看看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到公共公司擁有該公司47%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨的最大上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit US$565m market cap following a 9.8% gain in the stock.
因此,上週公共公司股價上漲9.8%,市值達到5.65億美元,成績最佳。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Magic Software Enterprises.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於magic software enterprises的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Magic Software Enterprises?
機構持股情況告訴我們有關magic software enterprises的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Magic Software Enterprises. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Magic Software Enterprises, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在magic software enterprises中持有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查magic software enterprises過去的收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Magic Software Enterprises is not owned by hedge funds. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 47% of shares outstanding. With 7.0% and 1.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Clal Financial Management Ltd and Migdal Mutual Funds Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
Magic Software Enterprises不是由對沖基金持有的。 配方系統(1985)有限公司是目前持有47%股份的最大股東。 克拉爾金融管理有限公司和米格達爾互助基金有限公司分別持有7.0%和1.5%的持股量,是第二和第三大股東。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。
Insider Ownership Of Magic Software Enterprises
Magic Software Enterprises的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$565m, and the board has only US$2.2m worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有者僅擁有魔術軟件企業有限公司不到1%的股份。其市值僅爲56500萬美元,並且董事會只持有220萬美元的股份。許多人傾向於希望看到董事會擁有更多的股份。一個不錯的下一步可能是查看這個關於內部買入和賣出的免費摘要。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有公司34%的股份,因此不能輕鬆忽視。儘管持股規模很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 47% of the Magic Software Enterprises shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有Magic Software Enterprises股票總數的47%。 我們不能肯定,但很可能這是一種戰略性股份。 這些企業可能類似,或者合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Magic Software Enterprises has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司真正的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如,承擔風險 - Magic Software Enterprises有1個警示標誌,我們認爲你應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。