share_log

An Excellent Week for Redwood Trust, Inc.'s (NYSE:RWT) Institutional Owners Who Own 82% as One-year Returns Inch Higher

An Excellent Week for Redwood Trust, Inc.'s (NYSE:RWT) Institutional Owners Who Own 82% as One-year Returns Inch Higher

紅木信託公司(NYSE:RWT)的機構投資者在過去一年的回報率略有提高,82%的股份歸他們所有,這是一個出色的周。
Simply Wall St ·  18:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Redwood Trust implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 紐交所的機構持有大量紅杉信託的股份意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響力。
  • 前八大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

If you want to know who really controls Redwood Trust, Inc. (NYSE:RWT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰實際控制着紅杉信託公司(紐交所股票代碼:RWT),那麼你需要看一下公司股東名冊的構成。機構持有82%的股份,是公司最大的股東。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 5.8% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 9.9%.

作爲結果,上週該公司股價上漲了5.8%,機構投資者獲得了最多的回報。 上週的收益將進一步提高股東的一年回報率,目前爲9.9%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Redwood Trust.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Redwood Trust的什麼。

big
NYSE:RWT Ownership Breakdown September 13th 2024
NYSE:RWt 所有權拆分於2024年9月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Redwood Trust?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於紅木信託?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Redwood Trust does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Redwood Trust's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Redwood Trust確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的一部分股票。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。 但是,不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人都會犯錯誤一樣。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看Redwood Trust的下面的盈利歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:RWT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 13th 2024
紐交所:RWt收益和營業收入增長2024年9月13日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Redwood Trust. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. With 11% and 10% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Wellington Management Group LLP are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應該注意到,機構實際上擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同發揮重要作用。我們注意到,對於Redwood Trust,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。BlackRock公司目前是該公司最大的股東,持有17%的流通股。The Vanguard Group和Wellington Management Group LLP分別持有11%和10%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股東。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Redwood Trust

紅木信託的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Redwood Trust, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$978m, and insiders have US$12m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股東可能會有興趣了解,紅木信託公司的內部人士持有股份。市值僅爲97800萬美元,內部人士以自己的名字持有1200萬美元的股份。看到內部人士進行了一些投資是好事,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Redwood Trust. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有紅木信託公司17%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響他們對公司政策的決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Redwood Trust (3 are a bit unpleasant) that you should be aware of.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定了紅木信託公司的 4 個警示信號(其中 3 個有點不太愉快),您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論