share_log

Institutional Investors in IDT Corporation (NYSE:IDT) See US$61m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in IDT Corporation (NYSE:IDT) See US$61m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

紐交所(NYSE:IDT)上的IDt Corporation機構投資者上週市值減少6100萬美元,儘管長期獲利對他們有利。
Simply Wall St ·  09/12 18:18

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies IDT's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着IDT的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有13名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

Every investor in IDT Corporation (NYSE:IDT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 46% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

iDT公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:IDT)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。機構擁有46%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$61m last week. Still, the 59% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週該公司的市值下降了6100萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。儘管如此,59%的一年期漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about IDT.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於iDT的什麼。

big
NYSE:IDT Ownership Breakdown September 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:IDT 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IDT?

關於IDT,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that IDT does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of IDT, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,iDT確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下iDT過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:IDT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:IDT 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 12 日

IDT is not owned by hedge funds. Our data suggests that Howard Jonas, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 16%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 4.8% of the stock. In addition, we found that Samuel Jonas, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

iDT 不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據表明,同時也是公司最高主要高管的霍華德·喬納斯持有的股票數量最多,爲16%。當內部人士持有公司大量股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人士願意將自己的財富綁定在公司的未來中。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.4%和4.8%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官塞繆爾·喬納斯將0.7%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東擁有該公司51%的總所有權,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of IDT

IDT 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in IDT Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$927m, and insiders have US$176m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有iDT公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲9.27億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1.76億美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in IDT. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有iDT22%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 14%, of the IDT stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎擁有iDT股票的14%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with IDT .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在iDT中發現的1個警告信號。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論