share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as ProAssurance Corporation's (NYSE:PRA) Recent 7.3% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as ProAssurance Corporation's (NYSE:PRA) Recent 7.3% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

機構持有者可能採取激烈行動,因爲proassurance公司(紐交所:PRA)最近下跌了7.3%,進一步加劇了一年的損失
Simply Wall St ·  09/12 18:06

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ProAssurance's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 7 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,ProAssurance的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前7名股東擁有公司52%的股份
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

A look at the shareholders of ProAssurance Corporation (NYSE:PRA) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 85% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看ProAssurance Corporation(紐約證券交易所代碼:PRA)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。機構擁有85%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 7.3% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 31% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in ProAssurance's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

在上週該公司股價下跌7.3%之後,機構投資者遭受的損失最大。最近的虧損加上股東一年的虧損31%,可能不適合這群投資者。也被稱爲 「智能貨幣」,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果ProAssurance的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到不得不出售該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ProAssurance, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究ProAssurance的每種類型的所有者。

big
NYSE:PRA Ownership Breakdown September 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PRA 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ProAssurance?

關於ProAssurance,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ProAssurance. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ProAssurance, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在ProAssurance中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看ProAssurance過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:PRA Earnings and Revenue Growth September 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PRA 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 12 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in ProAssurance. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 8.6% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在ProAssurance中的股票不多。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約11%和8.6%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步挖掘發現,大股東中有7人約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of ProAssurance

ProAssurance 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in ProAssurance Corporation. In their own names, insiders own US$7.5m worth of stock in the US$646m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有ProAssurance公司的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值6.46億美元的公司價值750萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in ProAssurance. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有ProAssurance13%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論