share_log

Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LMB) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 10% Over the Past Week

Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LMB) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 10% Over the Past Week

Limbach Holdings, Inc.(納斯達克代碼:LMB)的大型機構持有人一定很高興,因爲股票在過去一週上漲了10%,給人留下了深刻印象。
Simply Wall St ·  09/11 19:26

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Limbach Holdings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Limbach Holdings的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前 15 名股東擁有公司 52% 的股份
  • 內部人士最近的購買

Every investor in Limbach Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LMB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 76% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

林巴赫控股有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LMB)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲76%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Last week's 10% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 109%.

上週10%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲109%的股東一年回報率。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Limbach Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於林巴赫控股的哪些信息。

big
NasdaqCM:LMB Ownership Breakdown September 11th 2024
納斯達克公司:LMB 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Limbach Holdings?

關於林巴赫控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Limbach Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Limbach Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者持有林巴赫控股公司的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看林巴赫控股的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:LMB Earnings and Revenue Growth September 11th 2024
納斯達克公司:LMB 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 11 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Limbach Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 8.3% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.1% of common stock, and First Trust Advisors LP holds about 4.9% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Michael McCann is the owner of 1.2% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在林巴赫控股公司的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是貝萊德公司,其已發行股票的8.3%。Vanguard Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有5.1%的普通股,First Trust Advisors LP持有該公司約4.9%的股份。此外,首席執行官邁克爾·麥肯是該公司1.2%股份的所有者。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 52% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前15名公司擁有該公司的總所有權爲52%,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Limbach Holdings

林巴赫控股公司的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Limbach Holdings, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$63m worth of stock in the US$727m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有林巴赫控股公司的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值7.27億美元的公司價值6300萬美元的股票。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Limbach Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有林巴赫控股公司13%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Limbach Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Limbach Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解林巴赫控股公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Limbach Holdings發現了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論