share_log

Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Latest 5.6% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Cricut, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRCT) Latest 5.6% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Cricut, Inc.(納斯達克:CRCT)最新下跌5.6%增加了一年的虧損,機構投資者可能考慮採取激進措施
Simply Wall St ·  09/10 20:53

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cricut's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 58% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Petrus Trust Company, LTA)
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着Cricut的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 公司58%的股份由單一股東持有(Petrus Trust Company,LTA)
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

Every investor in Cricut, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRCT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 68% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Cricut, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CRCT)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲68%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 5.6% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 36% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Cricut, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了5.6%。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這使股東一年的虧損增加了36%。也被稱爲 「智能貨幣」,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨出售Cricut的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cricut.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Cricut的什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:CRCT Ownership Breakdown September 10th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRCT 所有權明細 2024 年 9 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cricut?

關於Cricut,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Cricut already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cricut, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Cricut已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Cricut過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:CRCT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 10th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRCT 收益和收入增長 2024 年 9 月 10 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cricut. Petrus Trust Company, LTA is currently the company's largest shareholder with 58% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 14% and 2.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Ashish Arora, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Cricut進行有意義的投資。Petrus Trust Company,LTA目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的58%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的14%和2.1%。第二大股東阿什什·阿羅拉也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Cricut

Cricut 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Cricut, Inc.. Insiders own US$215m worth of shares in the US$1.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看來內部人士擁有Cricut, Inc.的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家價值12億美元的公司價值2.15億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Cricut you should be aware of, and 1 of them can't be ignored.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的Cricut的3個警告信號,其中一個不容忽視。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論