share_log

Smith & Wesson Brands (NASDAQ:SWBI) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Smith & Wesson Brands (NASDAQ:SWBI) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Smith & Wesson Brands(納斯達克:SWBI)的資產負債表有些緊張
Simply Wall St ·  09/09 21:31

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWBI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

由伯克希爾·哈撒韋公司的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李露對此毫不掩飾,他說:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。」當我們思考一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。我們注意到,史密斯和韋森品牌公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SWBI)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時危險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般而言,只有當公司無法通過籌集資金或用自己的現金流輕鬆還清債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能會一無所獲。但是,更常見(但仍然令人痛苦)的情況是,它必須以低廉的價格籌集新的股本,從而永久稀釋股東。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is Smith & Wesson Brands's Debt?

史密斯和韋森品牌的債務是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at July 2024 Smith & Wesson Brands had debt of US$69.9m, up from US$24.8m in one year. However, it also had US$35.5m in cash, and so its net debt is US$34.4m.

您可以點擊下圖查看更多詳情,該圖片顯示,截至2024年7月,史密斯和韋森品牌的債務爲6,990萬美元,高於一年的2480萬美元。但是,它也有3550萬美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲3,440萬美元。

big
NasdaqGS:SWBI Debt to Equity History September 9th 2024
NASDAQGS: SWBI 債券與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 9 月 9 日

How Healthy Is Smith & Wesson Brands' Balance Sheet?

史密斯和韋森品牌的資產負債表有多健康?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Smith & Wesson Brands had liabilities of US$80.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$112.8m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$35.5m and US$50.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$106.8m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,史密斯和韋森品牌的負債爲8,050萬美元,一年後到期的負債爲1.128億美元。另一方面,它有3550萬美元的現金和價值5,090萬美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出1.068億美元。

Since publicly traded Smith & Wesson Brands shares are worth a total of US$576.4m, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

由於公開交易的史密斯和韋森品牌股票總價值爲5.764億美元,因此這種負債水平似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。但是,有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東今後繼續監督資產負債表。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。因此,我們將債務與收益的關係考慮在內,包括和不包括折舊和攤銷費用。

Smith & Wesson Brands has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.45. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 15.2 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. In fact Smith & Wesson Brands's saving grace is its low debt levels, because its EBIT has tanked 24% in the last twelve months. Falling earnings (if the trend continues) could eventually make even modest debt quite risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Smith & Wesson Brands can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

史密斯和韋森品牌的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率很低,僅爲0.45。其息稅前利潤可支付高達15.2倍的利息支出。因此,我們對它超保守的債務使用相當放鬆。實際上,史密斯和韋森品牌的救贖之處在於其低債務水平,因爲其息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中下降了24%。收益下降(如果這種趨勢持續下去)最終也可能使即使是微不足道的債務也相當危險。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,該業務未來的盈利能力將決定史密斯和韋森品牌能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, Smith & Wesson Brands saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,值得檢查一下該息稅前利潤中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去的三年中,史密斯和韋森品牌的自由現金流總額爲負數。儘管投資者無疑預計這種情況將在適當的時候逆轉,但這顯然意味着其使用債務的風險更大。

Our View

我們的觀點

We feel some trepidation about Smith & Wesson Brands's difficulty EBIT growth rate, but we've got positives to focus on, too. To wit both its interest cover and net debt to EBITDA were encouraging signs. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Smith & Wesson Brands is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 1 warning sign with Smith & Wesson Brands , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我們對史密斯和韋森品牌難以實現的息稅前利潤增長率感到有些擔憂,但我們也有積極的方面需要關注。換句話說,其利息覆蓋率和淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比例都是令人鼓舞的跡象。當我們考慮所討論的所有因素時,在我們看來,史密斯和韋森品牌在使用債務方面正在冒一些風險。儘管這筆債務可以提高回報,但我們認爲該公司現在有足夠的槓桿作用。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。我們已經向史密斯和韋森品牌確定了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果你是那種喜歡在沒有債務負擔的情況下購買股票的投資者,那麼請立即查看我們的獨家淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論