share_log

Is Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB) Using Too Much Debt?

威廉姆斯公司(紐交所:WMB)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  09/09 20:35

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE:WMB) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」因此,很明顯,當你考慮任何給定股票的風險時,你需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務會使公司陷入困境。與許多其他公司一樣,威廉姆斯公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:WMB)也使用債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司面臨風險。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務會帶來什麼風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務可以幫助企業,直到企業難以償還債務,無論是新資本還是自由現金流。資本主義的組成部分是 「創造性破壞」 過程,在這種過程中,倒閉的企業被銀行家無情地清算。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司爲了控制債務,必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Williams Companies's Net Debt?

威廉姆斯公司的淨負債是多少?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2024, Williams Companies had US$26.3b of debt, up from US$24.4b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.

如下所示,截至2024年6月底,威廉姆斯公司的債務爲263億美元,高於去年同期的244億美元。點擊圖片查看更多細節。而且它沒有太多現金,因此其淨負債大致相同。

big
NYSE:WMB Debt to Equity History September 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:WMB 債券與股本的比率記錄 2024 年 9 月 9 日

How Strong Is Williams Companies' Balance Sheet?

威廉姆斯公司的資產負債表有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Williams Companies had liabilities of US$4.70b due within a year, and liabilities of US$33.0b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$55.0m and US$1.19b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$36.4b.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,威廉姆斯公司的負債爲47.0億美元,此後到期的負債爲330億美元。另一方面,它有5,500萬美元的現金和價值11.9億美元的應收賬款將在一年內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額364億美元。

This deficit is considerable relative to its very significant market capitalization of US$53.9b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Williams Companies' use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

與其539億美元的巨大市值相比,這一赤字相當可觀,因此這確實表明股東應密切關注威廉姆斯公司對債務的使用。如果其貸款人要求其支撐資產負債表,股東可能會面臨嚴重的稀釋。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)覆蓋其利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(包括淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。

Williams Companies's debt is 4.5 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 3.1 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Another concern for investors might be that Williams Companies's EBIT fell 11% in the last year. If things keep going like that, handling the debt will about as easy as bundling an angry house cat into its travel box. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Williams Companies's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

威廉姆斯公司的債務是其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的4.5倍,其息稅前利潤支付利息支出的3.1倍以上。這表明,儘管債務水平很高,但我們不會稱其爲有問題。投資者的另一個擔憂可能是威廉姆斯公司的息稅前利潤在去年下降了11%。如果事情繼續這樣下去,那麼處理債務就像把一隻憤怒的家貓捆到旅行箱裏一樣容易。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但是,未來的收益將決定威廉姆斯公司未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Williams Companies generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 85% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,威廉姆斯公司產生的自由現金流相當於其息稅前利潤的85%,超出了我們的預期。如果需要的話,這有利於償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Williams Companies's net debt to EBITDA and EBIT growth rate definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But the good news is it seems to be able to convert EBIT to free cash flow with ease. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Williams Companies is taking some risks with its use of debt. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Williams Companies that you should be aware of before investing here.

在我們看來,威廉姆斯公司的淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤和息稅前利潤的增長率無疑對其造成了壓力。但好消息是,它似乎能夠輕鬆地將eBIT轉換爲自由現金流。當我們考慮所討論的所有因素時,在我們看來,威廉姆斯公司在使用債務方面正在冒一些風險。因此,儘管這種槓桿率確實提高了股本回報率,但我們真的不希望看到它從現在開始增加。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如,我們發現了威廉姆斯公司的兩個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

當一切都說完之後,有時更容易將注意力集中在甚至不需要債務的公司上。讀者現在可以100%免費訪問淨負債爲零的成長型股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論