share_log

We Think Griffon (NYSE:GFF) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

We Think Griffon (NYSE:GFF) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

我們認爲格里豐(紐交所:GFF)可以控制好債務
Simply Wall St ·  09/08 20:42

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Griffon Corporation (NYSE:GFF) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,「波動性與風險遠非同義詞」。因此,明智的資金都知道,債務——通常涉及破產——是評估公司風險程度時的一個非常重要因素。格里豐公司(NYSE:GFF)確實有債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使公司變得更加危險。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但是如果企業不能償還貸款,那麼它存在於貸款人的掌握之中。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制公司。儘管這種情況不太常見,但我們經常看到因爲貸款人迫使企業以低於市場價格的價格籌集資本而導致負債累累的企業永久性地稀釋股東權益。當然,債務的好處在於,它通常代表着廉價的資本,尤其是當它代替那些能以高回報率再投資的公司而發生稀釋時。當我們考慮到債務水平時,我們首先要考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Griffon's Debt?

格里豐的債務是什麼?

As you can see below, Griffon had US$1.51b of debt, at June 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it does have US$133.5m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$1.37b.

正如下圖所示,在2024年6月,格里豐的債務爲15.1億美元,與前一年大致相同。點擊圖表可以了解更詳細的信息。然而,公司持有1.335億美元的現金,抵消了部分債務,使淨債務約爲13.7億美元。

big
NYSE:GFF Debt to Equity History September 8th 2024
紐交所:GFF債務股權歷史2024年9月8日

A Look At Griffon's Liabilities

格里豐負債情況一覽

The latest balance sheet data shows that Griffon had liabilities of US$386.7m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.77b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$133.5m as well as receivables valued at US$320.4m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.70b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

最新資產負債表顯示,格里豐一年內到期負債爲3.867億元美元,之後到期的負債爲17.7億美元。 抵消這些義務,格里豐持有1.335億元美元的現金,以及12個月內到期的應收賬款爲3.204億元美元。 所以它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款總額多出17億美元。

Griffon has a market capitalization of US$3.07b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

格里豐的市值爲3.07億美元,所以如果需要,它很有可能籌集現金改善負債表。 然而,仔細看一下它償還債務的能力仍然是值得的。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。

Griffon's debt is 2.9 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 4.1 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Fortunately, Griffon grew its EBIT by 4.0% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Griffon can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

格里豐的債務是EBITDA的2.9倍,而其EBIT則覆蓋了利息支出的4.1倍。 這表明儘管債務水平相當可觀,但我們不會說它們有問題。 幸運的是,格里豐在過去一年中EBIT增長了4.0%,相對於收入逐漸減少了債務。 債務情況最能從資產負債表中看出。 但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定格里豐是否能夠隨時間加強其資產負債表。 所以如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會對這份免費報告中的分析師盈利預測感興趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Griffon produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 63% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤是不夠的。 所以我們當然需要看看EBIT是否帶來相應的自由現金流。 在過去的三年裏,格里豐產生了堅實的自由現金流,佔其EBIT的63%,與我們的預期相當。 這些冷硬現金意味着它可以在想要時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for Griffon was the fact that it seems able to convert EBIT to free cash flow confidently. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For example, its interest cover makes us a little nervous about its debt. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about Griffon's use of debt. While debt does have its upside in higher potential returns, we think shareholders should definitely consider how debt levels might make the stock more risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example - Griffon has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

關於資產負債表,格里豐最引人注目的積極因素是它似乎能夠自信地將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。 但是我們上面提到的其他因素並不那麼令人鼓舞。 例如,它的利息佔盈利能力讓我們有點擔憂它的債務。 當我們考慮以上提到的所有因素時,我們對格里豐的債務使用感到有點謹慎。 雖然債務在潛在回報方面有其好處,但我們認爲股東們絕對應考慮債務水平可能使股票更加風險。 在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是關注的重點。 但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。 例如 - 格里豐有2個警示信號我們認爲您應該注意。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論