share_log

With 72% Ownership of the Shares, City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 72% Ownership of the Shares, City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有72%股權的City Holding公司(納斯達克:CHCO)受機構所有者嚴重主導
Simply Wall St ·  09/07 20:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, City Holding's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中持有的大量股權,City Holding的股價可能受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 總共有9個投資者持有該公司50%的股權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls City Holding Company (NASDAQ:CHCO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 72% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着City Holding公司(納斯達克:CHCO),那麼你必須看一下其股東註冊表的構成。擁有該公司最大股份的是機構,佔有72%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下降風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of City Holding, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究City Holding的每種股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:CHCO Ownership Breakdown September 7th 2024
納斯達克GS:CHCO股權分佈2024年9月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About City Holding?

機構持股告訴我們關於City Holding的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that City Holding does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see City Holding's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到City Holding確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們可能也會錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,存在着它們參與了一筆「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個交易方可能會爭相拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司,這個風險更高。你可以在下面看到City Holding的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲複雜的。

big
NasdaqGS:CHCO Earnings and Revenue Growth September 7th 2024
納斯達克:CHCO盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月7日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in City Holding. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.6% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。對City Holding,對沖基金持有的股份不多。目前,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,持有15%的流通股。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.6%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的公司股份由前9大股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of City Holding

City Holding的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in City Holding Company. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$38m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士在City Holding Company持有一些股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是很好的。內部人士持有價值3800萬美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。看到內部人士有這樣程度的投資是很好的。您可以在這裏查看看看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這樣的所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益中影響一項政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand City Holding better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for City Holding you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.

始終值得考慮擁有一家公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解city holding,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。比如說:我們已經發現了2個城市控股的警告信號,你應該注意其中的1個,而另一個則不能忽視。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論