share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$94m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BHF) Recent US$94m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構投資者可能會考慮採取激烈措施,因爲Brighthouse Financial, Inc.(納斯達克:BHF)最近的9400萬美元下跌加劇了長期的損失
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 18:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Brighthouse Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構高比例的持股意味着股東交易對Brighthouse Financial的股價影響很大
  • 前9大股東持有業務的52%。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

Every investor in Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:BHF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: BHF)的每個投資者都應該了解最有影響力的股東團體。該公司持有最大數量股份的團體,準確說是約83%,是機構。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.8b last week after a 3.4% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 11% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Brighthouse Financial, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

所以可以看出,在公司市值上週下跌3.4%之後,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體,市值降至2.8億美元。這組投資者可能對目前的虧損特別擔心,這使得股東的一年虧損率增加到11%。機構常常被稱爲「市場操縱者」,對任何股票的價格動態產生重大影響力。因此,如果下降趨勢繼續,機構可能面臨賣出Brighthouse Financial的壓力,這可能對個人投資者產生負面影響。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Brighthouse Financial.

在以下圖表中,我們關注Brighthouse Financial不同的所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:BHF Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
納斯達克: BHF所有權分佈2024年9月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brighthouse Financial?

機構持股比例對Brighthouse Financial有什麼提示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Brighthouse Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brighthouse Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Brighthouse Financial已經有機構進入股東名冊。確實,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票,並對其表示支持。但與其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更大。您可以在下面看到Brighthouse Financial的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事不僅於此。

big
NasdaqGS:BHF Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:BHF的盈利和營業收入增長於2024年9月6日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Brighthouse Financial. Our data shows that Dodge & Cox is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 10% and 9.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Eric Steigerwalt, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重大的影響力。對於Brighthouse Financial來說,避險基金沒有太多股份。我們的數據顯示,Dodge & Cox是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股份。其次是The Vanguard Group,Inc.和BlackRock,Inc.分別持有10%和9.8%的流通股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Eric Steigerwalt分配給他們的股份佔0.5%。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的研究,發現前9位股東持有的股份約佔登記表的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Brighthouse Financial

Brighthouse Financial的內部股東持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$30m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東可能會感興趣地知道,Brighthouse Financial, Inc.的內部人員擁有股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的一致性是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約3000萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探索內部一致性的問題,您可以點擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司16%的股份,因此不能被忽視。儘管所擁有的股份很多,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,這可能還不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論