Wabash National Says It Is Evaluating All Available Legal Options In Response To The Verdict By A St. Louis Jury In Williams, Which Is About A Case Related To A Motor Vehicle Accident In 2019
Wabash National Says It Is Evaluating All Available Legal Options In Response To The Verdict By A St. Louis Jury In Williams, Which Is About A Case Related To A Motor Vehicle Accident In 2019
The firm is evaluating all available legal options in response to the verdict by a St. Louis jury in Williams et al. v. Wabash. The case concerns a 2019 motor vehicle accident in which a passenger vehicle traveling at a high speed struck the back of a nearly stopped 2004 Wabash trailer.
公司正在評估對威廉姆斯等訴瓦巴什公司案件的判決所採取的所有可用法律選項。該案件涉及2019年的一起機動車事故，其中一輛乘用車以高速撞上了幾乎停下來的2004年瓦巴什拖車的背部。
"While this was a tragic accident, we respectfully disagree with the jury's verdict and firmly believe it is not supported by the facts or the law," said Wabash's General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer Kristin Glazner. "No rear impact guard or trailer safety technology has ever existed that would have made a difference here."
「雖然這是一起悲慘的事故，但我們尊重地不同意陪審團的裁決，並堅信這一裁決不符合事實或法律的支持，」瓦巴什公司總顧問兼首席行政官克里斯汀·格拉茲納表示。「從未存在過任何後撞防護裝置或拖車安全科技能在這裏發揮作用。」
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。