share_log

Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Independent Bank Corp.'s (NASDAQ:INDB) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Independent Bank Corp.的納斯達克:INDB的機構投資者上週損失了3.7%,但受益於長期收益。
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 18:00

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構持股顯著高,意味着美國獨立銀行的股價對機構交易行爲敏感。
  • 共有10位投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着美國獨立銀行股份有限公司(NASDAQ:INDB),那麼你需要看一下它的股東註冊表。機構持有該公司的最大股份,佔83%。換句話說,該機構面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$2.6b last week. However, the 17% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

在上週,公司市值下降至26億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。然而,17%的一年股東回報可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。然而,他們應該注意未來可能出現的進一步損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對美國獨立銀行的影響。

big
NasdaqGS:INDB Ownership Breakdown September 6th 2024
納斯達克指數在2024年9月6日的股權分佈。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

機構持股告訴我們有關美國獨立銀行的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Independent Bank. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Independent Bank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在美國獨立銀行擁有相當大的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經查看了這隻股票並且他們喜歡它。但是,就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,往往會導致股價大幅下跌。所以值得檢查美國獨立銀行的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

big
NasdaqGS:INDB Earnings and Revenue Growth September 6th 2024
納斯達克指數業績和營業收入增長於2024年9月6日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Independent Bank. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠對董事會決策產生強烈影響。我們注意到對於美國獨立銀行,對沖基金並沒有有意義的投資。目前,黑石集團是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有12%和5.6%的流通股份。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的挖掘,並發現前10大股東約佔註冊表的50%,這意味着除了大股東以外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

美國獨立銀行的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Independent Bank Corp.. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$24m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有美國獨立銀行少於1%的股份。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可以擁有一定比例的公司利益,而不需要擁有很大的比例股權。 在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2400萬美元的股份(以當前價格計算)。可以說,近期的買賣行爲同樣重要。 您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的普通大衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Independent Bank better, we need to consider many other factors.

總是值得考慮公司的股東群體,但要更好地了解美國獨立銀行,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論