share_log

With 88% Ownership, Jacobs Solutions Inc. (NYSE:J) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 88% Ownership, Jacobs Solutions Inc. (NYSE:J) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有88%股權的Jacobs Solutions Inc.(紐交所:J)享有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  09/06 03:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Jacobs Solutions' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構對該股份的大量持有,Jacob解決方案的股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響。
  • 前15名股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls Jacobs Solutions Inc. (NYSE:J), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 88% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Jacobs Solutions Inc.(紐交所:J),那麼你需要看一下它的股權登記情況。持有該公司最多股份的集團,約佔88%,是機構。換句話說,該集團在他們對該公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或損失最多)收益。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Jacobs Solutions.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Jacobs Solutions不同所有權群體的比例。

big
NYSE:J Ownership Breakdown September 5th 2024
紐交所: J所有權分佈2024年9月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jacobs Solutions?

機構持股告訴我們有關雅各布解決方案的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Jacobs Solutions. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jacobs Solutions, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在Jacobs Solutions中擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但是,我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌是很常見的情況。因此,值得檢查Jacobs Solutions過去的收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

big
NYSE:J Earnings and Revenue Growth September 5th 2024
紐交所:J利潤和營業收入增長2024年9月5日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jacobs Solutions. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. With 6.5% and 5.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

投資者應該注意,其實機構在公司中擁有超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的影響力。我們注意到對於Jacobs Solutions,對沖基金並沒有有意義的投資。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股份。跟着的是BlackRock, Inc.和State Street Global Advisors, Inc. 分別持有6.5%和5.9%的流通股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東註冊表後,我們可以看到15名股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有所有權中的大多數份額。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Jacobs Solutions

雅各布解決方案的內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Jacobs Solutions Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$193m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士在Jacobs Solutions Inc.持有一些股份。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共持有價值19300萬元的股份(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會關注他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。雖然持股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論