share_log

With 75% Ownership of the Shares, Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 75% Ownership of the Shares, Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有75%股份的雷蒙德·詹姆斯金融公司(紐交所:RJF)受機構投資者的嚴重控制
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 19:09

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Raymond James Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構在瑞傑金融的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響
  • 前十大股東擁有該公司的50%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Raymond James Financial, Inc. (NYSE:RJF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 75% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制瑞傑金融股份有限公司(NYSE:RJF),那麼你就必須看看其股權登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,機構在該公司中佔據了絕大部分的所有權,達到了75%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Raymond James Financial.

我們來仔細看看各種股東類型可以告訴我們關於瑞傑金融的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:RJF Ownership Breakdown September 5th 2024
紐交所:RJF擁有權益分佈2024年9月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Raymond James Financial?

機構持有量告訴我們關於瑞傑金融公司的信息。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Raymond James Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Raymond James Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

瑞傑金融已經有機構登記股東名冊。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有某種程度的信譽。然而,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會快速下降。因此,值得查看以下瑞傑金融的收入歷史。當然,真正重要的是未來。

big
NYSE:RJF Earnings and Revenue Growth September 5th 2024
紐交所:RJF盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月5日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Raymond James Financial. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.4% and 7.0% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對於瑞傑金融來說,對沖基金的投資並不重要。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是公司最大的股東,持有11%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東的持股比例分別約爲9.4%和7.0%。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的挖掘,並發現前10大股東約佔註冊表的50%,這意味着除了大股東以外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Raymond James Financial

瑞傑金融公司內部股權持有情況。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Raymond James Financial, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$2.4b worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,瑞傑金融公司的內部人士確實擁有股份。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共計擁有24億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會關注他們是否有買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Raymond James Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通投資者佔據14%的所有權,主要由個體投資者組成,他們對瑞傑金融有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能完全左右決策,但確實對公司的運營產生了真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Raymond James Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。比如,投資風險這個常駐的幽靈。我們已經發現了瑞傑金融出現了1個警告信號,理解它們應該成爲你投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論