share_log

Guess? (NYSE:GES) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Guess? (NYSE:GES) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Guess? (紐交所:GES) 通過債務使用承擔一些風險
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 02:25

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Guess?, Inc. (NYSE:GES) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性和風險並不是同義詞。」當我們考慮一家公司的風險程度時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲過度的債務可能導致破產。重要的是,Guess公司(NYSE:GES)確實承載有債務。但股東們是否應該擔心它的債務使用情況?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果一家企業無法償還債務,則存在債權人的擺佈中。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是公司必須以低於市場價格發行股份,永久地稀釋股東,以彌補其資產負債表。儘管有稀釋,債務對於那些需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說是一個極好的工具。在我們審視債務水平時,首先要考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does Guess? Carry?

Guess公司的債務有多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at August 2024 Guess? had debt of US$579.7m, up from US$547.2m in one year. On the flip side, it has US$218.9m in cash leading to net debt of about US$360.9m.

下面的圖片可以點擊以獲取更詳細的信息,顯示了2024年8月Guess公司的債務爲57970萬美元,比一年前的54720萬美元增加。另一方面,它有21890萬美元的現金,淨債務約爲36090萬美元。

big
NYSE:GES Debt to Equity History September 4th 2024
紐交所:GES債務股本比歷史記錄 截止到2024年9月4日

How Healthy Is Guess?'s Balance Sheet?

Guess?的財務狀況如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Guess? had liabilities of US$855.5m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.39b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$218.9m as well as receivables valued at US$332.0m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.69b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

仔細觀察最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到Guess?在12個月內有85550萬美元的負債,在此之外有13.9億美元的負債。抵消這些責任,它有21890萬美元的現金以及33200萬美元的應收賬款,在12個月內到期。所以它的負債總額超過現金和短期應收賬款的1.69億美元。

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$1.11b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Guess? would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

這個負債使這家總資產爲11.1億美元的公司籠罩在陰影中,就像一個巨人屹立於凡人之上一樣。所以我們要密切關注它的資產負債表,毫無疑問。畢竟,如果Guess?今天必須償付債權人,它可能需要進行重大再資本化。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Service Corporation International的債務是其EBITDA的3.5倍,而其EBIT可覆蓋其利息開支的3.7倍。綜合考慮,雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以應對當前的槓桿。好消息是,Service Corporation International在過去12個月中將其EBIT提高了2.9%,從而逐漸降低了其相對於收益的債務水平。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中獲得了有關債務的大部分內容。但是,相對於資產負債表,更重要的是未來收益,這將決定Service Corporation International維持健康資產負債表的能力。如果您關注未來,您可以查看此免費報告,其中有分析師的利潤預測。

Guess? has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.2. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 18.5 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Fortunately, Guess? grew its EBIT by 2.1% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Guess? can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Guess?的淨債務與息稅攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率只有1.2,非常低。而且它的息稅前利潤(EBIT)完全可以覆蓋利息費用,相當於18.5倍。所以我們對它極端保守的債務使用非常放心。幸運的是,Guess?在過去一年中的息稅前利潤(EBIT)增長了2.1%,使得債務負擔看起來更加可控。當你分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是要重點關注的領域。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定Guess?能否逐步加強其資產負債表。所以,如果你想知道專業人士的看法,你可能會對這份有關分析師盈利預測的免費報告感興趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Guess?'s free cash flow amounted to 49% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

最後,公司只能用現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。所以值得檢查一下,有多少息稅前利潤(EBIT)是由自由現金流支持的。在過去三年中,Guess?的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤(EBIT)的比例爲49%,低於我們的預期。這種弱的現金轉換率使其更難處理債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

We'd go so far as to say Guess?'s level of total liabilities was disappointing. But at least it's pretty decent at covering its interest expense with its EBIT; that's encouraging. Once we consider all the factors above, together, it seems to us that Guess?'s debt is making it a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Guess? you should be aware of.

我們認爲Guess?的總負債水平令人失望。但至少用其EBIT覆蓋利息支出的能力相當不錯;這是鼓舞人心的。考慮到以上所有因素後,我們認爲Guess?的債務使其有點風險。有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們對潛在風險謹慎,所以我們可能更願意它承擔更少的債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。舉個例子:我們已經發現了Guess?的2個警示信號,你應該意識到。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論