share_log

In the Wake of Taboola.com Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:TBLA) Latest US$77m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Taboola.com Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:TBLA) Latest US$77m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在納斯達克上市公司Taboola.com Ltd. (納斯達克股票代碼:TBLA) 最新市值下跌了7700萬美元的情況下,機構持股者可能被迫採取嚴厲行動
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 01:23

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Taboola.com's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 6 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中持有的大部分股權,Taboola.com的股價可能受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前6大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Taboola.com Ltd. (NASDAQ:TBLA) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 30% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Taboola.com Ltd. (納斯達克:TBLA)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體擁有最大的實力。我們可以看到,機構在該公司中擁有30%的股權。換句話說,該群體從對該公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或損失最多)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 6.6% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 12% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Taboola.com which might hurt individual investors.

機構投資者上週看到其持股價值下跌了6.6%。毫無疑問,最近的損失進一步加劇了股東一年來的損失達12%,這對這類股東來說可能不會順利。 機構或「流動性提供方」控制着大量資金,因此這類投資者通常對股價變動具有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌持續下去,機構投資者可能會面臨賣出Taboola.com的壓力,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Taboola.com.

讓我們仔細觀察一下,看看不同類型的股東對Taboola.com有什麼信息可以告訴我們。

big
NasdaqGS:TBLA Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
納斯達克:TBLA 2024年9月4日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Taboola.com?

機構持股對Taboola.com有什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Taboola.com. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Taboola.com's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Taboola.com中持有相當大的股份。這說明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會有一定風險,它們可能處於一種「擁擠交易」中。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司來說,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Taboola.com的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住這其中總會有更多的故事。

big
NasdaqGS:TBLA Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
納斯達克GS:TBLA收益和營業收入增長2024年9月4日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Taboola.com. Our data shows that Yahoo Inc. is the largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.1% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Adam Singolda, the CEO has 3.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到,對於Taboola.com,對沖基金並沒有意義的投資。 我們的數據顯示雅虎公司是最大的股東,持有25%的流通股份。 作爲參照,第二大股東持有約6.9%的流通股份,第三大股東擁有6.1%的所有權。 此外,我們發現首席執行官Adam Singolda擁有3.6%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的研究,並發現前六大股東持有約50%的股份登記簿,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在某種程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Taboola.com

Taboola.com內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Taboola.com Ltd.. Insiders own US$156m worth of shares in the US$1.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們的信息顯示,內部人士在Taboola.com Ltd.持有大量股份。 內部人士在這家市值12億美元的公司中擁有1.56億美元的股份。 這是相當有意義的。 大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。 您可能希望訪問這張免費圖表,顯示內部人士最近的交易情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,在該公司中持有25%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。儘管佔有相當大的股份,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能無法改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 6.9% stake in Taboola.com. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有Taboola.com的6.9%股權。這意味着他們在重大政策決策中可能具有影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權公司長揸股權,但總體而言,他們的投資週期較短,正如其名稱所示,不太投資公開公司。一段時間過後,他們可能會考慮出售並將資金重新投入其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 25%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司25%的股份。這值得進一步深入研究。如果類似內部人員等相關方對其中一傢俬人公司產生興趣,這應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能還對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Taboola.com that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然仔細考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體值得關注,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現了一項關於Taboola.com的警示信號,建議您在此進行投資之前了解清楚。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論