share_log

Recent 5.4% Pullback Would Hurt FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Insiders

Recent 5.4% Pullback Would Hurt FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) Insiders

最近的5.4%回調將對FLEX LNG有限公司(紐交所:FLNG)內部人員造成傷害。
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 01:05

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over FLEX LNG implies vested interests in company growth
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in FLEX LNG is 23%
  • FLEX LNG的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長的利益
  • 前四大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • FLEX LNG的機構持股爲23%

A look at the shareholders of FLEX LNG Ltd. (NYSE:FLNG) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下FLEX LNG Ltd.(紐交所:FLNG)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有實力。我們可以看到個別內部人持有該公司的大部分股權,擁有44%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 5.4% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

在上週股價下跌5.4%後,內部人員遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of FLEX LNG.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了flex lng的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:FLNG Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
紐交所:FLNG所有權拆分2024年9月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About FLEX LNG?

機構投資者持有FLEX LNG有何含義?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in FLEX LNG. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see FLEX LNG's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在flex lng中擁有相當大比例的股權。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的公信力。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在他們處於「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣一筆交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到flex lng的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事裏總是有更多內容。

big
NYSE:FLNG Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
紐交所:flex lng的收益和營業收入增長2024年9月4日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in FLEX LNG. The company's largest shareholder is John Fredriksen, with ownership of 43%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.9% and 2.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到對於flex lng這家公司,對沖基金並沒有重大投資。該公司最大的股東是約翰·弗雷德裏克森,持有43%的股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有股份未流通的2.9%和2.4%。

On looking further, we found that 50% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察發現,前4大股東持有50%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司決策中具有重要的發言權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of FLEX LNG

FLEX LNG的內部人員持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of FLEX LNG Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.4b, and insiders have US$626m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有合理比例的flex lng有限公司。其市值僅爲14億美元,內部持有自己名下價值62600萬美元的股份。這相當顯著。大多數人會說,這顯示出與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over FLEX LNG. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有34%股權的廣大公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對flex lng擁有一定的影響力。儘管這一群體不一定能左右決策,但肯定可以對公司的運行產生實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - FLEX LNG has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,看看風險 - flex lng 有 2 個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論