share_log

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

AECOM (NYSE:ACM) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

AECOM(紐交所:ACM)似乎相當明智地使用債務
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 22:26

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies AECOM (NYSE:ACM) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

一些人認爲,作爲投資者,最好將波動性而不是債務視爲風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過「波動性遠非風險的同義詞」。因此,看來聰明的人知道,債務(通常與破產有關)是評估公司風險程度時非常重要的因素。與許多其他公司一樣,AECOm(紐交所:ACM)利用債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務產生了多大的風險?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

一般來說,只有當企業無法輕易用籌資或自有現金流來償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。資本主義的一部分是「創造性破壞」的過程,失敗的企業會被它們的銀行家無情地清算。雖然這不太常見,但我們經常看到負債的公司由於借款人強迫他們以低價籌集資本而永久稀釋股東的權益。當然,債務可以是企業的重要工具,特別是在資本密集的企業中。考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要看其現金和債務總額。

What Is AECOM's Debt?

AECOM的債務是什麼?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 AECOM had debt of US$2.46b, up from US$2.14b in one year. On the flip side, it has US$1.66b in cash leading to net debt of about US$796.1m.

下面的圖像顯示,截至2024年6月,AECOm的債務爲24.6億美元,比一年前的21.4億美元有所增加。另一方面,它有16.6億美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲79610萬美元。

big
NYSE:ACM Debt to Equity History September 4th 2024
紐交所:ACM債務與股本歷史數據2024年9月4日

How Healthy Is AECOM's Balance Sheet?

AECOM的資產負債表有多健康?

The latest balance sheet data shows that AECOM had liabilities of US$6.29b due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.26b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.66b in cash and US$4.61b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$3.28b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,AECOM的負債在一年內將到期還款629億美元,之後將到期還款326億美元。然而,它有166億美元的現金和461億美元的應收賬款,將在12個月內到期。所以它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的組合多328億美元。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since AECOM has a huge market capitalization of US$13.4b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

雖然這看起來可能很多,但並不算糟糕,因爲AECOM的市值達到了134億美元,所以如果需要的話,它可以通過融資來增強資產負債表實力。但我們一定要保持警惕,以防其債務帶來過多風險。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。

AECOM has net debt of just 0.75 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 7.3 times the interest expense over the last year. Also good is that AECOM grew its EBIT at 17% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if AECOM can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

AECOM的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.75倍,表明其絕對不是一個魯莽的借款人。並且這種觀點得到了可靠的利息覆蓋支持,過去一年內,EBIT是利息費用的7.3倍。另外好的是,AECOM的EBIT在過去一年中增長了17%,進一步增強了其管理債務的能力。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解到債務的信息最多。但最終企業未來的盈利能力將決定AECOM是否能夠長期增強其資產負債表實力。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, AECOM generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 80% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最後,一家公司只能用冷硬現金而不是會計利潤來償還債務。因此,檢查EBIT的多少是以自由現金流支持。在過去的三年裏,AECOM的自由現金流額佔其EBIT的80%,超出了我們的預期。這使其有能力償還債務,如果有必要的話。

Our View

我們的觀點

AECOM's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think AECOM's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for AECOM that you should be aware of before investing here.

AECOM將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流,這表明它可以像Cristiano Ronaldo對付14歲以下的守門員一樣輕鬆處理債務。好消息還不止這些,因爲其淨債務與EBITDA比也支持這一印象!從更大的角度來看,我們認爲AECOM使用債務似乎相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。雖然債務確實帶來風險,但明智使用時也可以帶來更高的股東權益回報。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。例如,我們發現了一種針對AECOM的1項警告標誌,投資前您應該注意。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論