share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) With 83% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) With 83% Ownership

機構投資者在Knife River Corporation (紐交所:KNF) 的持股比例達到83%,註定有很大的利益關係。
Simply Wall St ·  08/27 20:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Knife River's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持股比例較高意味着Knife River的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前18大股東擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

If you want to know who really controls Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰實際控制着Knife River Corporation(紐交所:KNF),那麼你就必須看看其股東註冊表的構成。83%的持股比例,機構擁有公司中的最大股份。換句話說,該群體面對最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$4.5b in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 58% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週,機構投資者在該公司市值達到45億美元后獲得了最大的受益。該公司一年的投資回報率目前爲58%,上週的收益更是令人歡迎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Knife River, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們來深入了解Knife River的各種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

1724761120759
NYSE:KNF Ownership Breakdown August 27th 2024
NYSE:KNF所有權拆分於2024年8月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Knife River?

機構持有Knife River的股份,這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,大股價下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查Knife River的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住其他要考慮的因素。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Knife River does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Knife River, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到Knife River確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌是很常見的現象。因此,值得檢查Knife River過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

1724761122067
NYSE:KNF Earnings and Revenue Growth August 27th 2024
紐交所:KNF盈利和營業收入增長2024年8月27日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Knife River. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Perpetual Limited holds about 3.6% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對Knife River的投資基金沒有意義。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。第二大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有11%的普通股,Perpetual Limited持有約3.6%的公司股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前18名股東持有該公司50%的股份,這表明沒有任何單個股東控制着該公司。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Knife River

Knife River公司內部的持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Knife River Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$27m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有Knife River Corporation不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,所以董事會成員可能擁有該公司的重要利益,而且比例相對較小。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2700萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但也值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Knife River. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有Knife River 17%的股份。雖然這個群體不能決定事情,但肯定對公司的經營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Knife River .

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意我們在Knife River發現的1個警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論