share_log

Delcath Systems Publishes Retrospective Study By Independent Investigators In The Annals Of Surgical Oncology. The Study, Titled "Hepatic And Overall Progression-free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) As First-line Or Second-line...

Benzinga ·  Aug 27 20:34

Delcath Systems Publishes Retrospective Study By Independent Investigators In The Annals Of Surgical Oncology. The Study, Titled "Hepatic And Overall Progression-free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) As First-line Or Second-line Therapy For Metastatic Uveal Melanoma,"

Key Findings from the Study:

  • Overall Survival (OS): The study reported median OS of 22.4 months for patients treated with HEPZATO KIT as a first-line therapy (N=17) and 18.4 months as a second-line therapy (N=6).
  • Hepatic Progression-Free Survival (hPFS): Patients receiving HEPZATO KIT as first-line therapy had a median hPFS of 17.6 months (N=17), compared to 8.8 months (N=6) for immunotherapy and 9.2 months (N=7) for other liver-directed therapies. When used as a second-line therapy, HEPZATO KIT resulted in a median hPFS that was not reached (N=6), showing better outcomes than immunotherapy (14.7 months, N=5) and other liver-directed therapies (7.5 months, N=3) in this patient cohort.
  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS): The median overall PFS was 15.4 months (N=17) for patients receiving HEPZATO KIT as first-line therapy, compared to 8.8 months (N=6) for immunotherapy and 9.2 months (N=7) for other liver-directed therapies. In the second-line setting, HEPZATO KIT resulted in a median PFS of 22.2 months (N=6), compared to 14.7 months (N=5) for immunotherapy and 7.5 months (N=3) for other liver-directed therapies, reflecting longer disease control in this group.
The above content is for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice related to Futu. Although we strive to ensure the truthfulness, accuracy, and originality of all such content, we cannot guarantee it.
    Write a comment