share_log

Camtek Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:CAMT) Institutional Investors Lost 6.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Camtek Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:CAMT) Institutional Investors Lost 6.6% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

納斯達克上市公司Camtek Ltd.(納斯達克股票代碼:CAMT)的機構投資者上週虧損了6.6%,但從長期收益中受益。
Simply Wall St ·  08/27 19:49

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Camtek implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構對康特科技的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價具有重要影響
  • 總共有7個投資者持有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

A look at the shareholders of Camtek Ltd. (NASDAQ:CAMT) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 46% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一下康特科技有限公司(納斯達克:CAMT)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。該公司持有最多股份的群體,準確地說大約46%的股份屬於機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲的話,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下滑則損失最多)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$4.4b last week. However, the 81% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

在上週,該公司的市值下降到44億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。不過,股東的一年回報率爲81%,可能緩解了這一打擊。不過,我們會猜測他們將來會對弱點保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Camtek.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對康特科技能夠告訴我們些什麼。

1724759354885
NasdaqGM:CAMT Ownership Breakdown August 27th 2024
納斯達克中國行市場:康特科技所有權分佈於2024年8月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Camtek?

機構所有權告訴我們關於康特科技的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Camtek. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Camtek's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在康特科技擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但是我們不能單憑這個事實來判斷,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在它們可能處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會爭相快速賣出股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到康特科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜的。

1724759356641
NasdaqGM:CAMT Earnings and Revenue Growth August 27th 2024
納斯達克GM:康特科技的盈利和營業收入增長(2024年8月27日)

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Camtek. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Priortech Ltd with 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 3.0% of the stock.

對康特科技來說,對沖基金持有的股份不多。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Priortech Ltd,持有21%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約17%和3.0%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現該公司超過一半的股權由前7大股東持有,這意味着較小股東的利益在一定程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Camtek

康特科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Camtek Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$5.9m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

根據我們的數據顯示,內部人士以個人名義擁有康特科技有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能通過我們還沒有捕捉到的公司結構間接持有股份。這是一家相當大的公司,所以董事會成員可能擁有公司中有意義的利益,但佔比不大。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值大約590萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是一件好事,但檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在購買股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有公司的13%股權,因此不能被輕易忽略。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們有利時推動政策決策,但他們仍可以共同影響公司的政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 38% of the Camtek shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到,上市公司持有康特科技發行股份的38%。很難確定,但這表明它們擁有交織在一起的業務利益。這可能是一個戰略性持股,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Camtek that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了康特科技的1個警示信號,您在投資之前應該注意這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論