share_log

Institutional Investors in ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) See US$106m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) See US$106m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

ACm Research公司(納斯達克:ACMR)的機構投資者上週市值減少1.06億美元,儘管長期收益使他們受益。
Simply Wall St ·  08/27 18:14

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in ACM Research implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders own 12% of ACM Research
  • 機構在ACm Research的大股東意味着他們對公司的股價具有重大影響力。
  • 總共有16家投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔50%的所有權。
  • 內部人持有ACm Research的12%。

A look at the shareholders of ACM Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 55% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看ACm Research, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACMR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。機構持有55%的股份,是公司中最大的股東。換句話說,這個群體在對公司的投資中有最大的收益(或者虧損)機會。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$106m last week. However, the 22% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週,ACM Research的市值下降了1060萬美元,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。然而,股東們在過去一年中獲得了22%的回報,這可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但他們可能會對未來的損失持謹慎態度。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ACM Research.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注ACM Research的不同股權所有者。

1724753687264
NasdaqGM:ACMR Ownership Breakdown August 27th 2024
納斯達克:ACMR所有權分佈2024年8月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ACM Research?

機構所有權告訴我們關於ACM Research的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ACM Research. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ACM Research's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在ACM Research擁有相當大的權益。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下降。因此,查看下面的ACM Research收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

1724753688922
NasdaqGM:ACMR Earnings and Revenue Growth August 27th 2024
ACMR盈利和營收增長於2024年8月27日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ACM Research. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Hui Wang with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.5% and 6.2% of the stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此它們可以集體行使重要的影響力。我們注意到對於ACM Research來說,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是CEO Hui Wang,持有9%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大的股東持有約6.5%和6.2%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的了解,我們發現前16名股東共同擁有公司50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司有足夠的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of ACM Research

ACM Research的內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of ACM Research, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.2b, and insiders have US$151m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看來,內部持有着ACM Research,Inc.相當大的比例。它的市值僅爲12億美元,內部人士自己名下的股份總價值爲15100萬美元。這相當可觀。看到這種投資水平是很好的。您可以在這裏查看內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有該公司21%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以使決策有利於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 11% stake in ACM Research. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

股權投資公司持有ACm Research 11%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有些人可能喜歡這一點,因爲股權投資有時是持有管理層責任的激進份子。但有時候,股權投資也在剝離股權,讓公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with ACM Research (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) .

我發現了解一家公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解一下我們在ACm Research上發現的3個警示信號(包括1個讓我們感到有點不安的信號)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論