share_log

Positive Week for Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRA) Institutional Investors Who Control 42% of the Company

Positive Week for Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRA) Institutional Investors Who Control 42% of the Company

納斯達克NMRA公司:機構投資者掌握該公司42%股份,上週表現積極。
Simply Wall St ·  08/16 20:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Neumora Therapeutics implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構的大量持有意味着它們對Neumora Therapeutics的股價有重大影響
  • 業務的52%由前4大股東持有。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of Neumora Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NMRA) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.(納斯達克:NMRA)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到機構在該公司中擁有的所有權爲42%。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, institutional investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 4.9% gain.

因此,機構投資者是上週4.9%增長的最大受益者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Neumora Therapeutics.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東告訴我們關於Neumora Therapeutics的內容。

big
NasdaqGS:NMRA Ownership Breakdown August 16th 2024
NasdaqGS:NMRA所有權拆分2024年8月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Neumora Therapeutics?

機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於Neumora Therapeutics?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Neumora Therapeutics. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Neumora Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所見,機構投資者在Neumora Therapeutics中擁有相當大的權益。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票並且他們喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有股票時,總是存在一種可能性,即它們處於「擁擠交易」中。當這樣的買賣出錯時,可能會有多個方面競相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有成長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Neumora Therapeutics的歷史收益和營收,但請記住,故事總有更多的內容。

big
NasdaqGS:NMRA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 16th 2024
NasdaqGS:NMRA收益和營收增長2024年8月16日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Neumora Therapeutics. Amgen Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 22% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 20% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

對Neumora Therapeutics的股份持倉較少的是對沖基金。最大的股東目前是Amgen Inc.,擁有22%的流通股。爲了讓你更好理解,第二大股東持有約20%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.9%的所有權。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了一件事實,即約52%的公司由前四大股東控制,表明這些股東對公司具有重要的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Neumora Therapeutics

Neumora Therapeutics的內部人士持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$105m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告內部人員在Neumora Therapeutics, Inc.中擁有股份。這是相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的一致性是一件好事。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約爲1,050萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,檢查這些內部人員是否一直在出售仍然值得一看。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Neumora Therapeutics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Neumora Therapeutics 11%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響他們的政策決策,但仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 20%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資公司持有20%的股份,因此在塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略方面扮演着重要角色。從這個角度來看,一些投資者可能會被鼓舞,因爲私人股權投資公司有時能夠鼓勵幫助市場看到公司價值的戰略。或者,這些股東可能會在將其上市後退出投資。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 22% of the Neumora Therapeutics shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到上市的公司擁有Neumora Therapeutics發行的22%股份。很難確定,但這表明它們有錯綜複雜的業務利益。這可能是一個戰略性的持股,因此關注股權的變化是值得的。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Neumora Therapeutics (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同集團是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素需要考慮。爲此,您應該學習我們發現的2個警告信號,其中包括一個有點令人擔憂的Neumora Therapeutics。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論