Sanara MedTech Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SMTI) Market Cap up US$53m Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 31% as Well as Insiders
Sanara MedTech Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SMTI) Market Cap up US$53m Last Week, Benefiting Both Individual Investors Who Own 31% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Sanara MedTech by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 3 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Insiders own 30% of Sanara MedTech
- 個人投資者對Sanara MedTech的重大控制意味着普通公衆擁有更多影響管理和治理相關決策的權力。
- 前三大股東擁有該公司53%的股份。
- 內部人士持有Sanara MedTech的30%。
A look at the shareholders of Sanara MedTech Inc. (NASDAQ:SMTI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 31% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看Sanara MedTech Inc.(納斯達克:SMTI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最有力量。個人投資者佔據31%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該團體有望從其對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或損失最大)。
While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$53m market cap gain, insiders too had a 30% share in those profits.
儘管個人投資者是上週價值5300萬美元的市值增長中受益最多的團體,但內部人士在這些利潤中也擁有30%的份額。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sanara MedTech, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解Sanara MedTech的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sanara MedTech?
機構持股業已在Sanara MedTech的股權登記簿上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們也有時會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有股票時,總會存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險之中。當這樣一筆交易出現問題時,多個文化可能會競相快速售出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Sanara MedTech的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住還有更多的故事。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Sanara MedTech already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sanara MedTech's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Sanara MedTech已經有機構在股權登記簿上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們也有時會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有股票時,總會存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險之中。當這樣一筆交易出現問題時,多個文化可能會競相快速售出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Sanara MedTech的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住還有更多的故事。
Sanara MedTech is not owned by hedge funds. Catalyst Rochal, Llc is currently the company's largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 11%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company.
Sanara MedTech不是由對沖基金持有。Catalyst Rochal,Llc目前是公司的最大股東,持有30%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的12%和11%。有趣的是,前三大股東中的後兩位也擔任首席執行官和董事會成員的職務,這表明這些內部人士對公司有個人持股。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Sanara MedTech
Sanara MedTech的內部人士持有大量股份。內部人士在這家280,000,000美元公司中持有8500萬美元的股票。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。您可以在此處查看他們是否購買或出售。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Sanara MedTech Inc.. Insiders own US$85m worth of shares in the US$280m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
隨着31%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆可以在Sanara MedTech上產生一定影響。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sanara MedTech. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
考慮到股東的不同群體總是值得思考的。但是要更好地了解Sanara MedTech,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的永恒過程。我們已確定Sanara MedTech的4個警告信號(至少有1個有點不愉快),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 29%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營企業擁有已發行股份的29%。這可能值得進一步研究。如果相關方,如內部人,在其中一傢俬營企業有利益,那麼這應該在年報中披露。私營企業可能也對公司有戰略性的利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sanara MedTech better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Sanara MedTech (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮到股東的不同群體總是值得思考的。但是要更好地了解Sanara MedTech,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的永恒過程。我們已確定Sanara MedTech的4個警告信號(至少有1個有點不愉快),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。