share_log

Following a 32% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Roku, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROKU) Institutional Owners

Following a 32% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Roku, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROKU) Institutional Owners

在去年的32%下跌之後,最近的漲幅可能會讓Roku公司(NASDAQ:ROKU)的機構投資者感到滿意
Simply Wall St ·  20:01

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Roku's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 12% of Roku is held by insiders
  • 由於機構在股票中佔據大部分股份,因此Roku的股價可能受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 總共有7個投資者持有該公司50%的所有權。
  • Roku 12%的股份由內部持有。

A look at the shareholders of Roku, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROKU) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 64% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察Roku, Inc.(納斯達克:ROKU)的股東可以看出哪個群體最有權力。擁有公司最多股份,大約佔公司總股份的64%的群體是機構。換句話說,這個群體最可能從他們的投資到公司中獲得最多的收益,或者失去最多的收益。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 6.6% increase in the share price after a year of 32% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價出現6.6%的增長,經歷了32%的損失後這是一種收益可能開始向上趨勢的跡象。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Roku.

在下面的表格中,我們將放大Roku不同的所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:ROKU Ownership Breakdown August 14th 2024
NasdaqGS:ROKU所有權分配 2024年8月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Roku?

機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於Roku?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Roku already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Roku's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Roku已經有機構股東。他們擁有公司一個令人敬佩的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得一提的是,下面是Roku的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:ROKU Earnings and Revenue Growth August 14th 2024
NasdaqGS:ROKU盈利和營業收入增長,截至2024年8月14日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Roku is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Anthony Wood is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 9.2% and 8.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, FMR LLC and ARK Investment Management LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半以上的發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。Roku未被對沖基金持有。該公司的首席執行官Anthony Wood是最大的股東,持有12%的股份。擁有第二大股份的是FMR LLC和ARk投資管理有限公司,分別持有發行股份的9.2%和8.8%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現該公司超過一半的股權由前7大股東持有,這意味着較小股東的利益在一定程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Roku

Roku內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Roku, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$7.7b, and insiders have US$959m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明內部人員擁有Roku, Inc.相當一部分的股份。目前其市值只有77億美元,內部人員擁有9590萬美元的股份,這相當顯著。看到這麼多人投資是好事。您可以在此處查看內部人員最近是否一直購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Roku. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆持有Roku的股份佔比23%,這些大多是個人投資者,他們對Roku可能會產生一些影響。儘管這一所有權比例可能不足以促成他們有利的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策造成集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Roku better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Roku that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮到不同群體持有公司股份的情況,總是值得思考的。但要更好地了解Roku,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現Roku存在一個警告信號,投資之前您應了解其中的風險。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論