share_log

Declining Stock and Decent Financials: Is The Market Wrong About N-able, Inc. (NYSE:NABL)?

Declining Stock and Decent Financials: Is The Market Wrong About N-able, Inc. (NYSE:NABL)?

股價下跌,財務狀況良好:市場是否對 N-able, Inc.(紐交所:NABL)判斷錯誤?
Simply Wall St ·  08/10 22:53

N-able (NYSE:NABL) has had a rough month with its share price down 11%. But if you pay close attention, you might find that its key financial indicators look quite decent, which could mean that the stock could potentially rise in the long-term given how markets usually reward more resilient long-term fundamentals. Specifically, we decided to study N-able's ROE in this article.

N-able (紐交所:NABL) 的股價下跌了11%,但如果您密切關注的話,會發現其關鍵的財務指標看起來相當不錯,這意味着長期來看,股票有可能上漲,因爲市場通常獎勵更具彈性的長期基本面。本文將重點研究 N-able 的roe。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.

股東權益回報率ROE是測試公司增值能力和管理股東投資的有效性的指標。更簡單地說,它衡量公司在股東權益中的盈利能力。

How Is ROE Calculated?

淨資產收益率怎麼計算?

The formula for return on equity is:

權益回報率的計算公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for N-able is:

因此,根據上述公式,N-able的roe爲:

4.5% = US$32m ÷ US$724m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

4.5% = 3,200萬美元 ÷ 7,2400萬美元(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the yearly profit. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.04 in profit.

「回報」即爲年利潤。一種概念是,對於每1美元的股東資本,該公司賺取了0.04美元的利潤。

What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?

roe與盈利增長有何關係?

So far, we've learned that ROE is a measure of a company's profitability. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes.

到目前爲止,我們已經知道roe是衡量公司盈利能力的一種方法。現在我們需要評估公司重新投資或「保留」的利潤有多少,以此來了解公司的增長潛力。一般來說,其他因素相同的情況下,roe和利潤保留都較高的公司比不具備這些屬性的公司具有更高的增長率。

A Side By Side comparison of N-able's Earnings Growth And 4.5% ROE

N-able 收益增長與4.5%的roe一側比較。

It is quite clear that N-able's ROE is rather low. Even when compared to the industry average of 13%, the ROE figure is pretty disappointing. However, we we're pleasantly surprised to see that N-able grew its net income at a significant rate of 71% in the last five years. We reckon that there could be other factors at play here. For instance, the company has a low payout ratio or is being managed efficiently.

很明顯,N-able 的roe相當低。即使與行業平均水平的13%相比,roe數字也非常令人失望。但是,我們驚喜地發現,在過去五年中, N-able的淨利潤以顯着速度增長了71%。我們認爲這裏可能存在其他因素。例如,公司具有較低的派息比率或正在有效管理。

We then compared N-able's net income growth with the industry and we're pleased to see that the company's growth figure is higher when compared with the industry which has a growth rate of 19% in the same 5-year period.

然後,我們將N-able的淨利潤增長率與行業進行了比較,並高興地看到,在同一5年期內,公司的增長率高於具有19%增長率的行業。

big
NYSE:NABL Past Earnings Growth August 10th 2024
紐交所:NABL過去收益增長2024年8月10日

The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. One good indicator of expected earnings growth is the P/E ratio which determines the price the market is willing to pay for a stock based on its earnings prospects. So, you may want to check if N-able is trading on a high P/E or a low P/E, relative to its industry.

附加價值的基礎在很大程度上與其收益增長有關。投資者知道市場是否已經定價了公司預期的收益增長(或下降)是很重要的。通過這樣做,他們會知道股票是否即將進入清晰的藍色水域,或者是否等待着沼澤水域。預期收益增長的一個良好指標是市盈率,它根據其收益前景確定市場願意爲股票支付的價格。因此,您可能希望查看N-able是否按其行業的高或低市盈率交易。

Is N-able Efficiently Re-investing Its Profits?

N-able 是否在有效地重新投資其利潤?

Given that N-able doesn't pay any regular dividends to its shareholders, we infer that the company has been reinvesting all of its profits to grow its business.

鑑於N-able 不向股東支付任何定期股息,我們可以推斷該公司一直在重新投資其所有利潤以發展業務。

Summary

總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。

In total, it does look like N-able has some positive aspects to its business. Despite its low rate of return, the fact that the company reinvests a very high portion of its profits into its business, no doubt contributed to its high earnings growth. With that said, the latest industry analyst forecasts reveal that the company's earnings growth is expected to slow down. To know more about the company's future earnings growth forecasts take a look at this free report on analyst forecasts for the company to find out more.

總體而言,N-able 的業務具有一些積極的方面。儘管回報率低,但公司將其利潤的很大一部分重新投資到其業務中,無疑促進了其高收益增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測顯示,公司的盈利增長預計將放緩。有關該公司未來盈利增長預測的更多信息,請參閱有關該公司的分析師預測的免費報告。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論