share_log

LanzaTech Global, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LNZA) Stock Price Dropped 27% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

LanzaTech Global, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LNZA) Stock Price Dropped 27% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

LanzaTech 全球貨幣公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LNZA)的股價上週下跌27%;個人投資者將不會感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  08/08 21:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over LanzaTech Global by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 5 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Insider ownership in LanzaTech Global is 18%
  • 個人投資者對LanzaTech Global的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多的力量影響管理和治理決策。
  • 前5大股東擁有公司的55%股份。
  • LanzaTech Global的內部持股比例爲18%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of LanzaTech Global, Inc. (NASDAQ:LNZA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 31% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解LanzaTech Global, Inc. (納斯達克代碼:LNZA)真正的控制者是誰,了解該商業的所有權結構是非常重要的。個人投資者有31%的股份,擁有該公司的最大股份。換句話說,該群體最有可能從他們的投資中獲得最高的收益(或者最大的虧損)。

And following last week's 27% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

在上週的27%股價下跌後,個人投資者損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of LanzaTech Global, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討LanzaTech Global的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqCM:LNZA Ownership Breakdown August 8th 2024
納斯達克CM:LNZA所有權分佈2024年8月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LanzaTech Global?

機構投資者對LanzaTech Global說了什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that LanzaTech Global does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of LanzaTech Global, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到LanzaTech Global確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當部分股票。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經對股票進行了研究,並且他們喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售股票,那麼很容易看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查LanzaTech Global的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqCM:LNZA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 8th 2024
納斯達克CM:LNZA收益和營業收入增長2024年8月8日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in LanzaTech Global. Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 8.7% of the stock. In addition, we found that Jennifer Holmgren, the CEO has 1.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到,對於LanzaTech Global,對沖基金沒有太多實際投資。新西蘭養老金守護者目前是最大的股東,持有17%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約15%和8.7%的股份。此外,我們發現Jennifer Holmgren(CEO)將1.6%的股份分配給了自己的名字。

On looking further, we found that 55% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步了解後,我們發現前5大股東擁有公司55%的股份。 換句話說,這些股東對公司決策有話語權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of LanzaTech Global

LanzaTech Global的內部持股比例

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of LanzaTech Global, Inc.. Insiders own US$50m worth of shares in the US$277m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有LanzaTech Global,Inc.的相當比例。內部人員在這家價值27700萬美元的公司中擁有5000萬美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否一直在購買或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆 - 包括散戶投資者 - 持有公司31%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然此種持股規模可能不足以在他們的利益中左右決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 24%, private equity firms could influence the LanzaTech Global board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有24%股份的私募股權公司可能會對LanzaTech Global董事會產生影響。有時我們會看到私募股權公司長期停留,但一般來說,他們的投資期限較短,並且像名字一樣,不會在公共公司中投資太多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並將資本重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand LanzaTech Global better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - LanzaTech Global has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

始終考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體是值得的。但是,要更好地了解LanzaTech Global,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險 - 我們認爲LanzaTech Global有2個警告標誌,您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論