share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore First Merchants Corporation's (NASDAQ:FRME) Recent US$153m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore First Merchants Corporation's (NASDAQ:FRME) Recent US$153m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽略第一招商股份(納斯達克:FRME)近1,5300萬美元的市值下降,因爲長期利潤保持穩定。
Simply Wall St ·  08/06 01:45

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies First Merchants' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 顯著高的機構持股意味着第一招商的股價對他們的交易行爲很敏感。
  • 前十六大股東持有該公司51%的股權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

A look at the shareholders of First Merchants Corporation (NASDAQ:FRME) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 75% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下第一招商股份有哪些股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。擁有最大股份的群體便是持有75%所有權的機構。換個說法,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$153m last week. However, the 19% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

公司市值上週下跌了15300萬美元,機構投資者承受了最高的損失。然而,19%的一年回報或許有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of First Merchants, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解第一招商的每種所有權類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:FRME Ownership Breakdown August 5th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼FRME股權結構(2024年8月5日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Merchants?

機構持股告訴我們關於第一招商的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in First Merchants. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see First Merchants' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在第一招商擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證,他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在一種擁擠的交易風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個當事方可能會競相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以看到第一招商的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多的內容。

big
NasdaqGS:FRME Earnings and Revenue Growth August 5th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼FRME盈利和營收增長(2024年8月5日)

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in First Merchants. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 5.6% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的股份,董事會很可能要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到,對第一招商而言,對沖基金並沒有意義。該公司最大的股東是持有11%股權的黑巖集團公司。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有大約8.4%和5.6%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更詳細的研究,表明前16號股東擁有51%的股份,暗示沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of First Merchants

第一招商的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in First Merchants Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$32m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣了解到,內部人在第一招商持有股票。內部人持有價值3200萬美元的股份。大多數人會將其視爲真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內部人持股與公司投資業績間的聯繫,可以點擊此處查看他們的買賣情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over First Merchants. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

佔有24%股份的普通公衆,主要由個體投資者組成,對第一招商具有一定的影響力。儘管該公司的所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決策的贊同,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論