share_log

We Wouldn't Be Too Quick To Buy Marine Products Corporation (NYSE:MPX) Before It Goes Ex-Dividend

We Wouldn't Be Too Quick To Buy Marine Products Corporation (NYSE:MPX) Before It Goes Ex-Dividend

在海洋產品公司(紐交所:MPX)除權之前,我們不應該過於草率地買入。
Simply Wall St ·  08/04 20:48

Marine Products Corporation (NYSE:MPX) stock is about to trade ex-dividend in 4 days. The ex-dividend date is usually set to be one business day before the record date which is the cut-off date on which you must be present on the company's books as a shareholder in order to receive the dividend. The ex-dividend date is an important date to be aware of as any purchase of the stock made on or after this date might mean a late settlement that doesn't show on the record date. Thus, you can purchase Marine Products' shares before the 9th of August in order to receive the dividend, which the company will pay on the 10th of September.

Marine Products公司(紐交所: MPX)的股票將於4天后交易除息日期。除息日期通常設置在記錄日期前一天,也就是您必須成爲公司股東才能在該日期之前切斷的日期,以便獲得股息。除息日期是一個重要的日期,因爲在此日期之後或之後購買的股票可能意味着一個晚 settling,而在記錄日期上不顯示。因此,您可以在8月9日之前購買Marine Products的股票以獲得公司將於9月10日支付的股息。

The company's next dividend payment will be US$0.14 per share, and in the last 12 months, the company paid a total of US$0.56 per share. Looking at the last 12 months of distributions, Marine Products has a trailing yield of approximately 5.6% on its current stock price of US$9.98. Dividends are a major contributor to investment returns for long term holders, but only if the dividend continues to be paid. We need to see whether the dividend is covered by earnings and if it's growing.

該公司的下一個股息支付將爲每股0.14美元,在過去12個月中,該公司支付了總額爲0.56美元的股息。從過去12個月的分配情況來看,Marine Products的當前股價爲9.98美元,擁有約5.6%的回報率。股息對於長揸人的投資回報是一個重要貢獻者,但前提是股息繼續支付。我們需要看到股息是否得到盈利的保障並且是否增長。

Dividends are typically paid out of company income, so if a company pays out more than it earned, its dividend is usually at a higher risk of being cut. Marine Products paid out 74% of its earnings to investors last year, a normal payout level for most businesses. That said, even highly profitable companies sometimes might not generate enough cash to pay the dividend, which is why we should always check if the dividend is covered by cash flow. Marine Products paid out more free cash flow than it generated - 140%, to be precise - last year, which we think is concerningly high. We're curious about why the company paid out more cash than it generated last year, since this can be one of the early signs that a dividend may be unsustainable.

股息通常是從公司收入中支付的,因此,如果公司支付的金額超過了它賺取的收入,其股息通常面臨更高的風險被削減。Marine Products去年向投資者支付了其收入的74%,這是大多數企業的正常支付水平。話雖如此,即使高盈利公司有時也可能無法產生足夠的現金支付股息,這就是爲什麼我們應該始終檢查股息是否得到自由現金流的覆蓋。去年,Marine Products支出自由現金流比其生成的現金流多出140%,這是我們認爲非常令人擔憂的。我們很好奇爲什麼公司去年支付的現金比生成的現金多,因爲這可能是股息不可持續的早期跡象之一。

Marine Products does have a large net cash position on the balance sheet, which could fund large dividends for a time, if the company so chose. Still, smart investors know that it is better to assess dividends relative to the cash and profit generated by the business. Paying dividends out of cash on the balance sheet is not long-term sustainable.

Marine Products確實在資產負債表中擁有大量的淨現金頭寸,這可以爲一段時間內支持大量的股息,如果公司選擇這樣做的話。儘管如此,聰明的投資者知道,最好將股息與業務產生的現金和利潤進行評估。從資產負債表上的現金支付股息並不可持續。

While Marine Products's dividends were covered by the company's reported profits, cash is somewhat more important, so it's not great to see that the company didn't generate enough cash to pay its dividend. Were this to happen repeatedly, this would be a risk to Marine Products's ability to maintain its dividend.

雖然Marine Products的股息得到了公司報告的利潤的支持,但現金流相對更重要,因此,公司沒有產生足夠的現金來支付其股息並不好。如果重複發生,這將是Marine Products保持其股息能力的風險。

Click here to see how much of its profit Marine Products paid out over the last 12 months.

點擊此處以查看Marine Products在過去12個月中支付的利潤分配金額。

big
NYSE:MPX Historic Dividend August 4th 2024
紐交所:MPX歷史股息2024年8月4日

Have Earnings And Dividends Been Growing?

收益和股息一直在增長嗎?

Stocks with flat earnings can still be attractive dividend payers, but it is important to be more conservative with your approach and demand a greater margin for safety when it comes to dividend sustainability. If earnings fall far enough, the company could be forced to cut its dividend. That explains why we're not overly excited about Marine Products's flat earnings over the past five years. Better than seeing them fall off a cliff, for sure, but the best dividend stocks grow their earnings meaningfully over the long run.

即使收益平穩,股息仍然可能成爲有吸引力的股息支付人,但在股息的可持續性方面,我們需要更保守的方法並要求更大的安全保證。如果收益下降得足夠厲害,公司可能被迫削減其股息。這就解釋了爲什麼我們並不是特別興奮地看到過去五年中Marine Products的收益率保持不變。肯定比它們下滑好,但最好的股息股票在長期內增長其收益。

Another key way to measure a company's dividend prospects is by measuring its historical rate of dividend growth. Marine Products has delivered 14% dividend growth per year on average over the past 10 years.

衡量公司股息前景的另一種關鍵方法是衡量其歷史股息增長率。Marine Products在過去的10年中平均每年提供14%的股息增長。

To Sum It Up

總結一下

Should investors buy Marine Products for the upcoming dividend? It's not great to see earnings per share have been flat and that the company paid out an uncomfortably high percentage of its cash flow over the past year. Cash flows are typically more volatile than earnings, but this is still not what we like to see. It's not an attractive combination from a dividend perspective, and we're inclined to pass on this one for the time being.

投資者是否應該購買即將到來的Marine Products股息?看到每股收益保持不變,而公司在過去一年中支付了不適宜的高比例現金流的情況並不好。現金流通常比收益更具有波動性,但這仍然不是我們希望看到的情況。這對於股息方面來說並不是一個有吸引力的組合,因此我們傾向於暫時放棄這個想法。

With that being said, if you're still considering Marine Products as an investment, you'll find it beneficial to know what risks this stock is facing. Our analysis shows 1 warning sign for Marine Products and you should be aware of this before buying any shares.

話雖如此,如果您仍然考慮將Marine Products作爲一種投資,那麼了解這種股票面臨的風險將對您有所幫助。我們的分析顯示,Marine Products存在1個警告信號,您在購買任何股票之前都應該了解這一點。

If you're in the market for strong dividend payers, we recommend checking our selection of top dividend stocks.

如果你在尋找強勁的股息支付者,我們建議查看我們的頂級股息股票選擇。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論