share_log

Is Distribution Solutions Group (NASDAQ:DSGR) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Distribution Solutions Group (NASDAQ:DSGR) Using Too Much Debt?

Distribution Solutions Group (納斯達克:DSGR) 是否使用過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  08/03 21:51

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:DSGR) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

李錄傳奇基金經理(得到了查理·芒格的支持)曾說:“最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是資本永久性損失。” 當我們考慮一個公司的風險時,總是喜歡看看它的債務使用情況,因爲過度負債可以導致破產。 我們可以看到,Distribution Solutions Group,Inc.(納斯達克:DSGR)在其業務中使用了債務。 但這種債務對股東來說是否令人擔憂呢?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

當企業不能輕易地通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金來履行債務和其他負債時,負債和其他負債會對企業產生風險。 在最壞的情況下,如果企業無法償還其債權人,可能會破產。 雖然這不是太常見的,但我們經常看到負債累累的企業因爲貸款人迫使其以不利於價格的方式籌集資金而永久性地稀釋股東。 當然,債務可以是企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。 考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是考慮其現金和債務的總和。

What Is Distribution Solutions Group's Debt?

Distribution Solutions Group的債務是什麼?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Distribution Solutions Group had US$605.0m in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$46.8m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$558.2m.

下圖(可單擊以獲得更多詳細信息)顯示,Distribution Solutions Group在2024年6月擁有60500萬美元的債務,與前一年相同。 然而,它確實有4680萬美元的現金抵銷,導致淨債務約爲55820萬美元。

big
NasdaqGS:DSGR Debt to Equity History August 3rd 2024
納斯達克:DSGR股權負債歷史記錄2024年8月3日

How Strong Is Distribution Solutions Group's Balance Sheet?

Distribution Solutions Group的資產負債表有多強?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Distribution Solutions Group had liabilities of US$264.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$689.7m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$46.8m and US$235.8m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$671.7m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

從最近的資產負債表上,我們可以看到Distribution Solutions Group在一年內到期的負債爲26450萬美元,到期的負債爲68970萬美元。 另一方面,它擁有4680萬美元的現金和23580萬美元的應收賬款。 因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款加起來還多67170萬美元。 這個虧損並不嚴重,因爲Distribution Solutions Group價值15.4億美元,因此可能可以籌集足夠的資本來支撐其資產負債表,如果有需要的話。 但是,仔細研究其還債能力仍然是值得的。

This deficit isn't so bad because Distribution Solutions Group is worth US$1.54b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

Distribution Solutions Group的利息覆蓋率低達0.64倍,淨債務與EBITDA比率高達5.6倍,像一兩拳打在我們對Distribution Solutions Group的信心上。 這裏的債務負擔相當大。 更糟糕的是,Distribution Solutions Group在過去12個月中看到其EBIT大跌了62%。 如果收入繼續按這個軌跡發展,償還那筆債務負擔將比說服我們在雨中跑馬拉松更加困難。 分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯然的起點。 但最終,業務未來的盈利能力將決定Distribution Solutions Group能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看此免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的利潤預測。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Weak interest cover of 0.64 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.6 hit our confidence in Distribution Solutions Group like a one-two punch to the gut. The debt burden here is substantial. Even worse, Distribution Solutions Group saw its EBIT tank 62% over the last 12 months. If earnings continue to follow that trajectory, paying off that debt load will be harder than convincing us to run a marathon in the rain. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Distribution Solutions Group can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Distribution Solutions Group的利息覆蓋率只有0.64倍,而淨債務與EBITDA比率高達5.6倍,打擊了我們對Distribution Solutions Group的信心,就像被大雨淋溼的馬拉松選手一樣。這裏的債務負擔相當大。 更糟糕的是,Distribution Solutions Group在過去12個月中經歷EBIT的62%坍塌。如果收入繼續下降,支付那筆債務將比說服我們在雨中跑馬拉松更加困難。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯然的起點。但是,最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定Distribution Solutions Group在時間上是否能加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看此免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. In the last three years, Distribution Solutions Group's free cash flow amounted to 44% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,公司只能用乾硬的現金而不是會計利潤來償還債務。因此,我們明確需要查看EBIT是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,Distribution Solutions Group的自由現金流佔EBIT的比例爲44%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這不是很好的表現。

Our View

我們的觀點

To be frank both Distribution Solutions Group's interest cover and its track record of (not) growing its EBIT make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is not so bad. Overall, it seems to us that Distribution Solutions Group's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. Given our hesitation about the stock, it would be good to know if Distribution Solutions Group insiders have sold any shares recently. You click here to find out if insiders have sold recently.

坦白地說,Distribution Solutions Group的利息覆蓋率和其EBIT的(不)增長記錄使我們對其債務水平感到不安。但至少它的EBIT轉化爲自由現金流還不錯。總的來說,我們認爲Distribution Solutions Group的資產負債表對業務來說確實很風險。所以我們對這支股票的警惕程度幾乎和一隻貪吃的小貓對主人的魚池一樣高:被咬一次,就會膽怯兩次,正如人們所說的那樣。考慮到我們對這支股票的猶豫不決,知道Distribution Solutions Group內部人士最近是否出售任何股票是件好事。單擊此處查看內部人士最近是否出售。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論