share_log

With 65% Ownership of the Shares, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 65% Ownership of the Shares, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有65%股權的Kinder Morgan公司(NYSE:KMI)受機構投資者嚴重控制。
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 18:51

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Kinder Morgan's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構大量持有金德爾摩根的股份,這意味着他們的交易行爲會對股價產生影響。
  • 22家最大的股東持有該企業的50%股權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 65% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制金德爾摩根公司 (紐交所: KMI),那麼您需要看一下其股權登記簿的組成。擁有該公司最多股份的集團——確切地說是約 65% 的機構——是該公司的主要持股者。換句話說,這個集團所獲得的 (或失去的) 收益是最大的。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Kinder Morgan, beginning with the chart below.

接下來,我們將深入探討金德爾摩根的每一種股東類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:KMI Ownership Breakdown August 1st 2024
紐交所: KMI 持股比例拆分 (截至 2024 年 8 月 1 日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kinder Morgan?

機構持股給我們關於Kinder Morgan的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kinder Morgan. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Kinder Morgan's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在金德爾摩根擁有相當數量的股份。這可能意味着該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是謹慎地依賴所謂的機構投資者認可。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得注意金德爾摩根的收入歷史如下圖所示。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:KMI Earnings and Revenue Growth August 1st 2024
紐交所: KMI 收入和營業收入增長情況 (截至 2024 年 8 月 1 日)

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Kinder Morgan. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Kinder Morgan's case, its Top Key Executive, Richard Kinder, is the largest shareholder, holding 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對於金德爾摩根來說,其最大持股者是該公司最高負責人理查德 · 金德,他持有公司發行股份的 12%。作爲參考,第二大股東持有約 9.0% 的發行股份,第三大股東持有約 6.8% 的發行股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 22 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更多的研究,我們發現前22家公司合共佔有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Kinder Morgan

Kinder Morgan的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Kinder Morgan, Inc.. Insiders own US$5.9b worth of shares in the US$47b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明內部人員持有金德爾摩根公司相當比例的股份。內部人員持有這家美元 470 億市值公司價值 5.9 億美元的股份。這相當有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一樣進行投資。您可能希望訪問這個免費的圖表,以了解內部人員最近的交易情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然持有量相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Kinder Morgan better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Kinder Morgan that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮到公司股權情況的不同組,總是值得思考的。但如果想更好地了解金德爾摩根,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現金德爾摩根存在 2 個警示信號,您應該在投資該公司之前了解這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論