share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Middlesex Water Company (NASDAQ:MSEX) Institutional Owners After Losing 17% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Middlesex Water Company (NASDAQ:MSEX) Institutional Owners After Losing 17% Over the Past Year

在過去一年中,中興水務公司(納斯達克:MSEX)損失了17%,最近的反彈可能會取悅機構股東。
Simply Wall St ·  07/28 21:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Middlesex Water implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 米德爾賽克斯水務公司的機構持股意味着它們對公司股價有重大影響。
  • 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

Every investor in Middlesex Water Company (NASDAQ:MSEX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

納斯達克股票代碼爲MSEX的米德爾賽克斯水務公司的每個投資者都應意識到持股最多的股東群體,也就是佔有79%股份的機構。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最多的利益(或者蒙受最大的損失)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 6.7% increase in the share price after a year of 17% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲6.7%,因爲在17%虧損的一年之後,這標誌着收益率可能開始走高。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Middlesex Water, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討每個米德爾賽克斯水務公司所有者的類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:MSEX Ownership Breakdown July 28th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼爲MSEX的米德爾賽克斯水務公司的所有權分佈於2024年7月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Middlesex Water?

機構所有權對米德爾賽克斯水務公司的影響是什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Middlesex Water does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Middlesex Water, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到米德爾賽克斯水務公司確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票並且認爲它很不錯。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。看到如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時出售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查米德爾賽克斯水務公司的過去收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,還要記住有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:MSEX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 28th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼爲MSEX的米德爾賽克斯水務公司的收益和營業收入增長分佈於2024年7月28日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Middlesex Water. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 19%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.0% and 6.8% of the stock.

投資者應該知道,機構實際上佔有公司的一半以上,因此它們可以集體施加重大影響力。對於米德爾賽克斯水務公司而言,對沖基金沒有太多股票。該公司最大的股東是貝萊德公司,佔有19%的股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東大約佔有8.0%和6.8%的股票。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步了解,前8大股東持有該公司約51%的註冊股份,這意味着除了更大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。

Insider Ownership Of Middlesex Water

米德爾賽克斯水務公司的內幕股東

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Middlesex Water Company. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$21m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員持有米德爾賽克斯水務公司的一些股份。由於這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是好的。內部人員擁有2100萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人員的最近購買情況,請單擊此處。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Middlesex Water. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

佔有19%股份的普通大衆,多數由個人投資者組成,對米德爾賽克斯水務公司有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在其支持政策的決策中左右逢源,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Middlesex Water (1 doesn't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定了對於米德爾賽克斯水務公司存在2個警示信號(其中1個與我們的觀點不太吻合),你應該意識到這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論