share_log

Institutional Investors in Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT) Lost 7.0% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT) Lost 7.0% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

納斯達克上的應用材料公司的機構投資者在上週虧損了7.0%,但受益於長期的創業板增長。
Simply Wall St ·  07/26 18:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Applied Materials' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中擁有很大的股份,應用材料的股票價格可能很容易受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前25大股東擁有該公司47%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMAT) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 80% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察應用材料股份的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。我們能看到,機構在該公司中擁有80%的所有權。換言之,該團體的投資對本公司的收益(或虧損)影響最大。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$171b last week. However, the 40% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

公司市值上週降至1710億美元,機構投資者成爲受影響最大的群體。然而,一年的40%的股息回報或對他們的痛苦有所減輕。然而,他們應該注意未來進一步的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Applied Materials.

下圖中我們可以看到,在應用材料的不同所有權群體中,機構占主導地位。

big
NasdaqGS:AMAT Ownership Breakdown July 26th 2024
納斯達克GS:AMAt所有權分佈情況 2024年7月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Applied Materials?

關於應用材料機構持股意義是什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Applied Materials does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Applied Materials' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到應用材料確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明專業投資者對該公司的認可。但我們不能僅僅依賴於這個事實,因爲有時候機構也會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有同一只股票時,總是存在着一種“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可以競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以查看應用材料的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總不止眼前的苟且。

big
NasdaqGS:AMAT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 26th 2024
納斯達克GS:AMAt營業收入和收益增長情況,截至2024年7月26日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Applied Materials. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.1% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.0% and 4.8% of the stock.

由於機構投資者持有超過發行股票的一半,董事會可能會關注他們的偏好。對於應用材料,對沖基金並沒有太多持股。目前,最大的股東是範德高集團公司,持有公司發行股票的9.1%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.0%和4.8%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Applied Materials

應用材料的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that Applied Materials, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$507m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的資料表明,應用材料公司的內部股東持有不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此內部股東也擁有較小的公司持股比例。雖然他們的股份少於1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員通過集體持有價值5,0700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)而擁有權益。在這種情況下,了解這些內部股東是否正在買入或賣出股票可能會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Applied Materials. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

對於通常是個人投資者的大衆人群來說,他們持有應用材料19%的股份。雖然這種股份比例可能不足以影響其政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Applied Materials you should know about.

雖然考慮公司的不同所有權群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如風險。每個公司都存在風險,我們已經發現了應用材料的1個警示標誌,你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論