share_log

After Losing 45% in the Past Year, Yext, Inc. (NYSE:YEXT) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 45% in the Past Year, Yext, Inc. (NYSE:YEXT) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在過去一年中跌去45%後,Yext公司(紐交所:YEXT)的機構持有者對最近的收益可能會感到鬆了一口氣。
Simply Wall St ·  02:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Yext's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構在該股票中的大規模持股,Yext的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 企業前11大股東持有其51%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Yext, Inc. (NYSE:YEXT) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看Yext, Inc. (NYSE:YEXT)的股東,我們可以看出哪個群體最有權勢。持有60%的機構是最大的股東。換句話說,機構從他們對該公司的投資中可以獲得最多的利益(或者蒙受最大的損失)。

After a year of 45% losses, last week's 10.0% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

在經歷了一年的45%虧損之後,上週的10.0%的增長對於機構投資者來說是一個受歡迎的跡象,可能表明回報有望開始上升。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Yext.

讓我們更近距離地看看不同類型的股東對Yext的含義。

big
NYSE:YEXT Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
紐交所:YEXT所有權結構2024年7月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yext?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Yext的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Yext does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Yext's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Yext確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且他們喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得去看一下Yext下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:YEXT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
紐交所:YEXt收入和收入增長2024年7月18日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 5.3% of Yext shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.1% and 7.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Michael Walrath, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股權,因此他們可以一起有強大的影響力來影響董事會的決策。看起來對沖基金擁有Yext股票的5.3%。那是值得注意的,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(和更高的股價)。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是擁有12%股份的最大股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別擁有股份的9.1%和7.7%。此外,我們發現首席執行官Michael Walrath擁有分配給他們的股份的1.1%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的了解,我們發現前11名在該公司擁有51%的所有權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Yext

Yext的內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Yext, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$37m worth of the US$660m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人員擁有Yext, Inc.的股票。作爲個人,內部人員共擁有6600萬美元的3700萬美元價值的公司股票。這顯示出至少某些一致性。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Yext. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

以20%的持股比例來看,普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Yext有一定的影響。儘管擁有這麼多的股權,如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能還不足以改變公司的政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 9.1%, private equity firms could influence the Yext board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有9.1%的股份,私人股權公司可以影響Yext董事會的決策。有些人可能會喜歡這個,因爲私人股權有時是持有管理層負責的激進分子。但其他時候,私人股權正在出售,已經上市的公司。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Yext better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Yext you should be aware of.

考慮到不同群體擁有一家公司的股份,這總是值得思考的。但爲了更好地了解Yext,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。事實證明:我們已經發現了一個警示標誌,您應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論