share_log

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s (NYSE:ZIM) Market Cap Dropped US$78m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 50% Were Hit as Were Institutions

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.'s (NYSE:ZIM) Market Cap Dropped US$78m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 50% Were Hit as Were Institutions

ZIm Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.(NYSE:ZIM)的市值上週下跌了7800萬美元;持有50%股份的個人投資者以及機構也受到了影響。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 03:55

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 29%
  • 在ZIm Integrated Shipping Services中,個人投資者擁有相當大的所有權,這表明他們集體在管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權。
  • 該公司共有25位投資者,持股比例爲45%。
  • 在ZIm Integrated Shipping Services中,機構投資者的持股比例爲29%。

If you want to know who really controls ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE:ZIM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 50% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解誰真正控制着ZIm Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE:ZIM),那麼您需要看看其股份登記簿的構成。個人投資者擁有50%的股份,是該公司擁有最多股份的投資者群體。換句話說,這個群體從他們對該公司的投資中可以獲得最大的收益(或者承受最大的損失)。

While institutions, who own 29% shares weren't spared from last week's US$78m market cap drop, individual investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

雖然擁有29%股份的機構投資者上週也沒有幸免於ZIm Integrated Shipping Services市值下降了7800萬美元的影響,但作爲一個群體,個人投資者承受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

在下面的圖表中,我們着重關注了ZIm Integrated Shipping Services不同的所有權群體。

big
NYSE:ZIM Ownership Breakdown July 16th 2024
NYSE:ZIm Ownership Breakdown 2024年7月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZIM Integrated Shipping Services?

機構投資者在ZIm Integrated Shipping Services中的持股情況告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在ZIm Integrated Shipping Services中擁有相當大的一部分股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價下跌的情況並不鮮見。因此,值得注意的是,在評估該公司時,最好先了解它過去的收益軌跡。當然,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:ZIM Earnings and Revenue Growth July 16th 2024
NYSE:ZIm Earnings and Revenue Growth 2024年7月16日

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is not owned by hedge funds. Court Investments Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 3.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Eliyahu Glickman directly holds 1.1% of the total shares outstanding.

ZIm Integrated Shipping Services沒有被對沖基金所擁有。目前,Court Investments Limited是最大的股東,持有該公司21%的流通股。作爲參考,第二大股東持有約3.5%的流通股,第三大股東持有2.5%的流通股。此外,該公司的CEO Eliyahu Glickman直接持有公司總流通股的1.1%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services

ZIm Integrated Shipping Services的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$22m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到,內部人員在ZIm Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.中擁有股份。這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性非常好。內部人員持有價值2200萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會的利益已經保持了一致性。儘管如此,檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在拋售股票也是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 50% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有50%的所有權,普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對ZIm Integrated Shipping Services有一定的影響力。但是,這種相當大的所有權並不足以在公司政策不符合其他大股東的意願時改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 21%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司21%的股份。深入研究一下也許會很有價值。如果相關方,如內部人員,擁有其中一傢俬人公司的利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services you should know about.

我認爲看到一個公司的股東究竟有誰是非常有趣的。但是,爲了真正獲得深入的了解,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現了ZIm Integrated Shipping Services的2個警告信號,您需要了解一下。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論