share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Stepan Company (NYSE:SCL) Institutional Owners After Losing 4.1% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Stepan Company (NYSE:SCL) Institutional Owners After Losing 4.1% Over the Past Year

近期漲勢或會讓史提賓公司(紐交所:SCL)的機構股東在過去一年中損失4.1%後感到滿意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 03:55

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Stepan's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 考慮到機構對史提賓公司的股份佔比很大,股價可能會受到它們交易決定的影響。
  • 共有7名投資者佔據該公司的52%所有權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

Every investor in Stepan Company (NYSE:SCL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

紐交所:SCL所有的股東都應該知道最大的股東群體。 我們可以看到機構擁有該公司82%的所有權。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的收益(如果出現經濟衰退則會損失最大)。

Last week's US$98m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 4.1% losses.

在資金類型的乏力一年後,上週9800萬美元的市值增長可能會被機構投資者所欣賞。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Stepan.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了史提賓不同所有權群體的範圍。

big
NYSE:SCL Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
紐交所:SCL所有權拆分2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stepan?

機構所有權告訴我們史提賓有什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Stepan already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Stepan's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

史提賓公司的股份登記冊上已經有機構。實際上,他們擁有該公司的可觀股份。這表明專業投資者對該公司持有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變其對一個股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下下面的史提賓盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:SCL Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
紐交所:SCL營收和收入增長2024年7月15日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Stepan is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的發行股,董事會可能需要注意他們的喜好。史提賓不是由對沖基金擁有的。所持有的股份中現在BlackRock,Inc.是公司最大的股東,擁有15%的流通股。作爲背景,第二大股東持有流通股的約11%,第三大股東持有8.3%的股權。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現該公司超過一半的股權由前7大股東持有,這意味着較小股東的利益在一定程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Stepan

史提賓內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Stepan Company. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$116m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告內部人士擁有史提賓公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重要利益相關者擁有一些股份是一件好事。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約1.16億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探索內部人員對齊的問題,可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Stepan. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

憑藉12%的所有權,一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在控制史提賓方面具有一定影響力。雖然這種所有權可能不足以在政策決策方面起決定性作用,但仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Stepan that you should be aware of.

我發現看一家公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得深入見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了2個關於史提賓的警告標誌,您需要了解這些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論