share_log

Following a 57% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (NYSE:LEG) Institutional Owners

Following a 57% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (NYSE:LEG) Institutional Owners

由於近期漲幅,萊格特普萊特公司(紐交所:LEG)機構所有者可能會感到滿意,該公司去年下跌57%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 21:42

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Leggett & Platt's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Leggett & Platt的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 50% 的業務由前 18 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的購買

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (NYSE:LEG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 68% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了Leggett & Platt, Incorporated(紐約證券交易所代碼:LEG),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲68%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

After a year of 57% losses, last week's 8.8% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

在經歷了57%的虧損之後,上週8.8%的漲幅將受到機構投資者的歡迎,這可能表明回報率可能開始呈上升趨勢。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Leggett & Platt, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Leggett & Platt的每種所有者。

big
NYSE:LEG Ownership Breakdown July 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LEG 所有權明細 2024 年 7 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Leggett & Platt?

關於Leggett & Platt,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Leggett & Platt. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Leggett & Platt's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如你所見,機構投資者在Leggett & Platt中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Leggett & Platt的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:LEG Earnings and Revenue Growth July 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LEG 收益和收入增長 2024 年 7 月 12 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Leggett & Platt. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 9.7% and 5.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Karl Glassman is the owner of 0.9% of the company's shares.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Leggett & Platt進行有意義的投資。貝萊德公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的14%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和State Street Global Advisors, Inc.分別佔已發行股份的9.7%和5.7%,是第二和第三大股東。此外,首席執行官卡爾·格拉斯曼持有該公司0.9%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前18名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Leggett & Platt

Leggett & Platt 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$30m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到,內部人士擁有Leggett & Platt, Incorporated的股份。內部人士持有價值3000萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Leggett & Platt. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Leggett & Platt30%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Leggett & Platt has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉個風險吧——Leggett & Platt有3個警告信號(其中一個很重要),我們認爲你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論