share_log

Institutions Own 37% of U-Haul Holding Company (NYSE:UHAL) Shares but Private Companies Control 44% of the Company

Institutions Own 37% of U-Haul Holding Company (NYSE:UHAL) Shares but Private Companies Control 44% of the Company

機構持有 u-haul 控股 (NYSE:UHAL) 股票的37%,但私人公司控制着該公司的44%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 21:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in U-Haul Holding indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Institutions own 37% of U-Haul Holding
  • U-Haul Holding中私營公司擁有的巨大股份表明它們共同在管理和業務策略方面擁有更大的發言權。
  • 前三大股東持有該公司53%的股份。
  • 機構擁有U-Haul Holding的37%股權。

Every investor in U-Haul Holding Company (NYSE:UHAL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 44% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

U-Haul Holding的每位投資者(NYSE:UHAL)都應了解最有力的股東群體。私營公司佔有該公司的最大股份44%,換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And institutions on the other hand have a 37% ownership in the company. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.

機構佔有公司37%的股份。機構通常會持有大公司的股票,而我們預計會看到內部人員持有較小公司的顯著比例。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of U-Haul Holding.

如下圖所示,我們將重點關注U-Haul Holding的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:UHAL Ownership Breakdown July 12th 2024
NYSE:UHAL所有權分析2024年7月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About U-Haul Holding?

機構持股能告訴我們U-Haul Holding的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

U-Haul Holding already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at U-Haul Holding's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

U-Haul Holding已經在股權登記上擁有機構。的確,他們在公司中擁有可觀的持股。這表明專業投資者之間存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,看看U-Haul Holding以下的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:UHAL Earnings and Revenue Growth July 12th 2024
NYSE:UHAL盈利和營業收入增長2024年7月12日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in U-Haul Holding. The company's largest shareholder is Foster Road LLC, with ownership of 44%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 5.2% of common stock, and Yacktman Asset Management LP holds about 3.9% of the company stock.

對於U-Haul Holding而言,投資組合中對沖基金的股份不多。該公司最大的股東是Foster Road LLC,擁有44%的股份。第二大股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,擁有普通股的5.2%,而Yacktman Asset Management LP則持有該公司股票的約3.9%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of U-Haul Holding

U-Haul Holding的內部人員持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of U-Haul Holding Company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$102m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有U-Haul Holding Company不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能通過我們沒有注意到的公司結構間接擁有利益。由於規模如此之大,我們不希望內部人員擁有大量股份。總共,他們擁有1,020萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看那些內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

除股東之外(包括零售投資者)擁有公司18%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個團體可能無法少量披露信息,但它確定可以對公司的經營有真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到私人公司持有的已發行股份爲44%。很難僅從這個事實中得出任何結論,因此了解誰擁有這些私人公司也很值得。有時內部人員或其他關聯方通過一個獨立的私人公司擁有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with U-Haul Holding , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現查看公司具體所有人非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,一直存在的投資風險陰影。我們已經確定了U-Haul Holding的1個警告信號,理解它們應該是您投資過程中的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論