share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Autoliv (NYSE:ALV) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這4項措施表明奧托立夫(紐交所:ALV)合理地使用了債務
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 02:49

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Autoliv, Inc. (NYSE:ALV) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

戴維·伊本說得很好,“波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免永久性的資本損失。”因此,當您考慮某隻股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲太多的債務可能會使公司破產。我們可以看到Autoliv, Inc. (紐交所:ALV)在業務中使用了債務,但更重要的問題是:這些債務會帶來多少風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務在企業遇到困難無力償還的時候對企業的幫助很大,企業會借用新的資本或自由現金流來償還。資本主義的一部分是“創意毀滅”過程,失敗的企業會被銀行家無情清算。然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以折扣價格發行股票,以永久性地稀釋股東,以平衡其資產負債表。當然,債務的好處在於它經常代表着廉價的資本,特別是當它用高回報率再投資取代了稀釋股東的時候。而考慮一家公司的債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務放在一起考慮。

What Is Autoliv's Debt?

Autoliv的債務是多少?

As you can see below, Autoliv had US$2.14b of debt, at March 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$569.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.57b.

就像下面所看到的,截至2024年3月,Autoliv負有21.4億美元的債務,與前一年大致相同。您可以單擊圖表以獲取更詳細的信息。但它也擁有56900萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲1.57億美元。

big
NYSE:ALV Debt to Equity History July 11th 2024
紐交所:ALV股權負債歷史記錄 July 11th 2024

How Healthy Is Autoliv's Balance Sheet?

Autoliv的資產負債表狀況如何?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Autoliv had liabilities of US$3.66b due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.23b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$569.0m as well as receivables valued at US$2.19b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$3.12b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Autoliv有36.6億美元的短期債務和22.3億美元的長期債務。抵消這些義務的是,它有56900萬美元的現金和價值21.9億美元的應收賬款,將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款多312億美元。

Autoliv has a market capitalization of US$8.52b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

Autoliv的市值爲85.2億美元,因此如果需要,它很可能會籌集資金來改善其財務狀況。但很明顯,我們必須密切審查其是否能夠在不稀釋股東權益的情況下管理其債務。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過查看淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA)並計算其利息費用(利息覆蓋)來相對衡量公司的負債水平。這樣,我們考慮債務的絕對規模以及支付的利息費用。

Autoliv has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.2. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 11.4 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On top of that, Autoliv grew its EBIT by 50% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Autoliv can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Autoliv的淨債務/息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率僅爲1.2,其利息支出足以覆蓋11.4倍。因此,你可以認爲它對其債務的威脅不比大象對老鼠的威脅更大。此外,Autoliv在過去12個月中EBIt增長了50%,這種增長將使它更容易應對債務。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Autoliv's free cash flow amounted to 35% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,雖然稅務機關可能喜歡會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冷酷無情的現金。因此,我們始終會檢查多少EBIt轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,Autoliv的自由現金流佔其EBIt的35%,低於我們的預期。當涉及償還債務時,這不是很好的情況。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Autoliv's impressive EBIT growth rate implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that Autoliv can handle its debt fairly comfortably. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Autoliv you should know about.

令人高興的是,Autoliv令人矚目的EBIt增長率意味着其在債務方面具有優勢。但更令人沮喪的是,我們有點擔心它將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的能力。綜合考慮所有這些因素,我們認爲Autoliv能夠相當輕鬆地應對其債務。正面的是,這種槓桿作用可以提高股東回報,但潛在的風險也更大,因此值得監測財務狀況。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個明顯的檢查點。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表以外的風險。這些風險可能很難被發現。每個公司都有,我們已經發現了Autoliv的3個警告跡象,您應該知道。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

總的來說,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包含這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論