share_log

Walmart Inc.'s (NYSE:WMT) Market Cap Touched US$562b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

Walmart Inc.'s (NYSE:WMT) Market Cap Touched US$562b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

沃爾瑪公司(紐交所:WMT)上週市值達到5620億美元,45%持股私營公司和機構均受益。
Simply Wall St ·  01:32

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Walmart indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 沃爾瑪的私營公司擁有相當大的控股權,表明它們集體在管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權
  • 一共有3個投資者持有該公司的絕大多數股份,佔有50%的股權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Walmart Inc. (NYSE:WMT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解沃爾瑪公司(紐交所:WMT)真正的控制者,了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,私人公司擁有公司的大部分控股權,佔45%。換句話說,該集團有可能獲得(或失去)他們投資公司的最多的收益。

Following a 3.2% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but institutions who own 35% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上週股價上漲3.2%,私人公司最爲受益,35%的股票由機構持有者擁有,他們也從漲價中獲利。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Walmart, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解沃爾瑪的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:WMT Ownership Breakdown July 11th 2024
紐交所:WMt所有權分佈2024年7月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Walmart?

機構投資者在沃爾瑪中擁有相當數量的股份,這意味着在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,這類情況常常出現大幅度股價下跌。因此,檢查沃爾瑪公司過去的盈利軌跡(如下)是值得的。當然,還要記住考慮其他因素。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Walmart. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Walmart, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

紐交所:WMt收入和營收增長2024年7月11日,沃爾瑪不是由對沖基金擁有的。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是沃爾頓企業有限責任公司,擁有37%的流通股份。第二大股東持有約7.9%的流通股份,第三大股東持有5.1%的權益。

big
NYSE:WMT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 11th 2024
沃爾瑪的管理層內部持股情況表明他們擁有公司不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們未發現的企業架構間接擁有權益。作爲一個如此巨大的公司,我們不希望管理層內部持有大量股票。總的來說,他們共計擁有50億美元的股票。最近的買賣行爲同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買賣股票。

Walmart is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Walton Enterprises, LLC with 37% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

持股19%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在沃爾瑪公司擁有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權比例可能不足以使政策決策偏向於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司的政策產生集體影響。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Walmart

思考公司所有股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地了解沃爾瑪,我們需要考慮許多其他因素,例如公司的風險。沃爾瑪存在2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該意識到。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Walmart Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$5.0b of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,沃爾瑪公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們未發現的企業架構間接擁有權益。作爲一個如此巨大的公司,我們不希望管理層內部持有大量股票。總的來說,他們共計擁有50億美元的股票。最近的買賣行爲同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買賣股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Walmart. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆擁有19%的股權,主要由個人投資者組成,在沃爾瑪公司有一定的說服力。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以使政策決策偏向於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司的政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 45%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

思考擁有公司股份的不同機構總是值得的。但要更好地了解華峯化學有限公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如:我們已經發現華峯化學有限公司的1個警示信號,你需要了解。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Walmart better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Walmart has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

思考公司所有股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地了解沃爾瑪,我們需要考慮許多其他因素,例如公司的風險。沃爾瑪存在2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該意識到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論