share_log

Northern Trust Corporation (NASDAQ:NTRS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 83%

Northern Trust Corporation (NASDAQ:NTRS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 83%

北方信託公司(納斯達克:NTRS)是機構投資者的熱門選擇,其佔比達83%。
Simply Wall St ·  00:00

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Northern Trust's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構所有權過高意味着北方信託的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 50% 的業務由前 14 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Northern Trust Corporation (NASDAQ:NTRS), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了北方信託公司(納斯達克股票代碼:NTRS),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲83%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,將大量機構資金投資於公司通常被視爲理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Northern Trust.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關北方信託的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:NTRS Ownership Breakdown July 11th 2024
NASDAQGS: NTRS 所有權明細 2024 年 7 月 11 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Northern Trust?

關於北方信託,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Northern Trust. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Northern Trust's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者持有相當數量的北方信託股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,它們總是有處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Northern Trust的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事還有更多。

big
NasdaqGS:NTRS Earnings and Revenue Growth July 11th 2024
NASDAQGS: NTRS 收益和收入增長 2024 年 7 月 11 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Northern Trust is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. With 7.6% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。北方信託不歸對沖基金所有。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大的股東,已發行股份的11%。貝萊德公司和道富環球顧問公司分別擁有7.6%和4.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前14名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Northern Trust

北方信託的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Northern Trust Corporation. Insiders own US$232m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有北方信託公司的股份。內部人士擁有價值2.32億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Northern Trust has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例——北方信託有1個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論