share_log

Insiders of OPKO Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPK) Must Be Frustrated After Market Cap Dropped US$56m Since Recent Purchases

Insiders of OPKO Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPK) Must Be Frustrated After Market Cap Dropped US$56m Since Recent Purchases

自OPKO Health,Inc.(NASDAQ:OPK)內部人士近期購買以來,市值下跌了5千6百萬美元,他們一定很失望。
Simply Wall St ·  07/02 21:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • OPKO Health's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 4 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • OPKO 健康的重要內部所有權表明對公司擴張的固有利益。
  • 前4大股東擁有公司的50%的股份。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of OPKO Health, Inc. (NASDAQ:OPK), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要想了解誰真正掌控OPKO健康公司(納斯達克:OPK),了解業務的所有權結構就很重要。 我們可以看到,個別內部人員擁有公司50%的所有權。 換句話說,這個團體最有可能從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或者失去最多)。

And looking at our data, we can see that insiders have bought shares recently. So the news of stock price falling by 6.1% is not something they might have been expecting soon after purchasing shares.

通過觀察我們的數據,我們可以看到內幕人士最近購買了股票。 因此,股價下跌6.1%的新聞並不是他們購買股票後不久就可能預料到的事情。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about OPKO Health.

讓我們更近距離地觀察一下不同類型的股東可以爲我們提供有關OPKO健康公司的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:OPK Ownership Breakdown July 2nd 2024
納斯達克GS:OPK所有權狀態分解截至2024年7月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About OPKO Health?

機構投資者持有OPKO健康公司的證券數量告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in OPKO Health. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see OPKO Health's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如你所見,機構投資者在OPKO健康公司中持有很大的比例。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好不要過多地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。 當多個機構持有某個股票時,存在這樣一個風險,即它們可能處於“擁擠的交易”中。 當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。 在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。你可以看下面的OPKO健康公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事還有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:OPK Earnings and Revenue Growth July 2nd 2024
納斯達克GS:OPK營收和收益增長狀態從2024年7月2日開始

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in OPKO Health. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Phillip Frost with 35% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.8% and 4.8% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Gary Nabel is also Senior Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到對OPKO健康公司沒有重大投資的對沖基金。 從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是首席執行官菲利普·弗羅斯特,其持有的股份達35%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.8%和4.8%的股票。有趣的是,第二大股東Gary Nabel也是高級主管,再次表明該公司的頂級股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究也揭示了一個事實,即四大股東大約控制着公司的50%的股份,這表明這些所有者在業務中具有重要的影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of OPKO Health

OPKO健康公司的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of OPKO Health, Inc.. Insiders have a US$432m stake in this US$871m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

似乎內部人員擁有OPKO健康公司的相當大比例。內部人員在這家價值8.71億美元的公司中持有4.32億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。單擊此處以查看他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over OPKO Health. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有23%股權的散戶(主要包括個人投資者)對OPKO健康公司具有一定影響力。 儘管該團體不一定能夠決定大局,但當然確實對公司的經營產生了實質影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that OPKO Health is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我覺得了解公司的實際擁有者非常有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。 請注意,OPKO健康公司在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道......

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論