share_log

Institutional Shareholders May Be Less Affected by CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCCS) Pullback Last Week After a Year of 0.09% Returns

Institutional Shareholders May Be Less Affected by CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CCCS) Pullback Last Week After a Year of 0.09% Returns

納斯達克:CCCS股票上週回撤,機構股東或受影響較小,一年只有0.09%回報。
Simply Wall St ·  01:43

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前6名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:CCCS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了CCC智能解決方案控股公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CCCS),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲52%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 3.1% last week. However, the 0.09% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

投資虧損是任何股東都不喜歡的事情,更不用說上週持股價值下降3.1%的機構投資者了。但是,0.09%的股東一年回報率可能減輕了打擊。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於CCC智能解決方案控股公司的信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CCCS Ownership Breakdown July 1st 2024
納斯達克GS:CCC的所有權明細 2024年7月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings?

關於CCC智能解決方案控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CCCS Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
納斯達克GS:CCC的收益和收入增長 2024年7月1日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Advent International, L.P. with 26% of shares outstanding. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.2% of common stock, and Oak Hill Capital Management, LLC holds about 5.3% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Githesh Ramamurthy directly holds 3.2% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。CCC智能解決方案控股公司不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Advent International, L.P.,其已發行股份的26%。T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有8.2%的普通股,橡樹山資本管理有限責任公司持有該公司約5.3%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官吉特什·拉馬穆爾西直接持有已發行股份總額的3.2%。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前六名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings

CCC智能解決方案控股公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$245m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有CCC智能解決方案控股公司的部分股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2.45億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司12%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 32%, private equity firms could influence the CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有32%的股份,可以影響CCC智能解決方案控股董事會。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解CCC智能解決方案控股公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論