share_log

DocuSign, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:DOCU) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.5% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy

DocuSign, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:DOCU) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.5% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy

DocuSign公司(納斯達克股票代碼:DOCU)在上週漲了3.5%後,一年內回報率攀升,機構投資者一定很滿意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/01 22:40

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies DocuSign's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持股比較高意味着DocuSign的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 最高的24位股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看DocuSign, Inc.(納斯達克: docusign)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個團體最具影響力。而擁有該公司80%所有權的機構,佔據了最大的一塊餅。換句話說,該集團面臨的上漲潛力(或下降風險)最大。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 3.5% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 3.3%.

因此,機構投資者在上週公司股價上漲3.5%後獲得了最多的回報。上週的收益還將進一步提高股東的一年回報,目前爲3.3%。接下來,讓我們更加深入地了解DocuSign,看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們哪些信息。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DocuSign.

讓我們更仔細地觀察一下,看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於DocuSign的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:DOCU Ownership Breakdown July 1st 2024
納斯達克GS: DOCU 2024年7月1日所有權結構分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DocuSign?

機構持股比例對DocuSign有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

DocuSign already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DocuSign's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

DocuSign的股份登記簿上已經有機構了。事實上,他們在公司中持有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這些股票,他們喜歡這些股票。但是就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一種股票時,總有風險存在'超買情況'。當這種交易出現問題時,多個交易方可能會爭相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到DocuSign的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:DOCU Earnings and Revenue Growth July 1st 2024
納斯達克GS: DOCU 2024年7月1日盈利和營業收入增長情況

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in DocuSign. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體發揮重要影響力。對DocuSign而言,對沖基金持有的股份不多。目前,The Vanguard Group,Inc.擁有最大的股東,佔已發行股份的10%。爲了提供背景信息,第二大股東擁有約6.4%的已發行股份,緊隨其後的是第三大股東擁有3.4%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 24 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進行更多的挖掘後,我們發現前24個股東在該公司擁有50%的綜合所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司具有重要控制力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of DocuSign

DocuSign的內部股東

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in DocuSign, Inc.. Insiders own US$119m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股東可能會有興趣了解DocuSign,Inc.的內部人員是否擁有股份。內部人員擁有總價值爲1.19億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。能看到這個投資的水平是很不錯的。您可以在此處查看內部人員最近是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。儘管這樣的持股規模相當可觀,但如果決策不與其他大股東一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand DocuSign better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for DocuSign that you should be aware of.

我們應該考慮擁有公司股份的不同團體。但是,要更好地理解DocuSign,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了DocuSign的1項警告標誌,您應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論